TSYX vs. SAA
TSYX (TSPY Lift ETF) and SAA (ProShares Ultra SmallCap600) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TSYX is actively managed, while SAA is passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSYX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SAA.
Performance
TSYX vs. SAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TSYX
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -2.78%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SAA
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- 10.49%
- YTD
- 39.76%
- 6M
- 33.10%
- 1Y
- 65.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.84%
- 10Y*
- 12.84%
TSYX vs. SAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TSYX TSPY Lift ETF | 2.83% |
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 29.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSYX and SAA is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2026 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSYX vs. SAA — Risk / Return Rank
TSYX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SAA
TSYX vs. SAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TSPY Lift ETF (TSYX) and ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 (SAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSYX | SAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSYX vs. SAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSYX drawdown since its inception was -13.39%, smaller than the maximum SAA drawdown of -87.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYX and SAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSYX | SAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.39% | -87.39% | +74.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -50.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.82% | 0.00% | -4.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -27.35% | +24.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.59% | — |
Volatility
TSYX vs. SAA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSYX | SAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 24.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.09% | 36.09% | -17.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 43.52% | -24.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 46.15% | -27.06% |
TSYX vs. SAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSYX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than SAA's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSYX vs. SAA - Dividend Comparison
TSYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.31%, more than SAA's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAA ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 | 0.72% | 1.05% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.35% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.14% |
TSYX TSPY Lift ETF | 7.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSYX and SAA have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SAA is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SAA is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TSYX.
TSYX has the higher dividend yield at 7.31%, compared with 0.72% for SAA.
They also come from different issuers: TappAlpha and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TSYX and 0.95% for SAA.
Find the right allocation for TSYX and SAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer