TSYW vs. FLSP
TSYW (Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF) and FLSP (Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSYW is a Leveraged Bonds fund actively managed by Roundhill, while FLSP is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. TSYW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FLSP.
Performance
TSYW vs. FLSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSYW achieves a -1.25% return, which is significantly lower than FLSP's 2.34% return.
TSYW
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- -1.25%
- 6M
- -1.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLSP
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 3.30%
- 1Y
- 15.79%
- 3Y*
- 10.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- —
TSYW vs. FLSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF | -1.25% | -3.37% |
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF | 2.34% | 1.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSYW and FLSP is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSYW vs. FLSP — Risk / Return Rank
TSYW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLSP
TSYW vs. FLSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF (TSYW) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSYW | FLSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSYW vs. FLSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSYW drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, smaller than the maximum FLSP drawdown of -22.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYW and FLSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSYW | FLSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.79% | -22.75% | +12.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.65% | -0.90% | -4.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -6.26% | +2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.39% | — |
Volatility
TSYW vs. FLSP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSYW | FLSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.76% | 9.08% | +1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.76% | 13.35% | -2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.76% | 13.48% | -2.72% |
TSYW vs. FLSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSYW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FLSP's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSYW vs. FLSP - Dividend Comparison
TSYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.20%, more than FLSP's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF | 2.59% | 2.65% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 2.18% | 1.19% | 8.08% |
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF | 8.20% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSYW and FLSP have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLSP is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLSP is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSYW.
TSYW has the higher dividend yield at 8.20%, compared with 2.59% for FLSP.
TSYW is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while FLSP is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSYW and 0.65% for FLSP.
Find the right allocation for TSYW and FLSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer