TSYW vs. COMB

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

TSYW (Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSYW is a Leveraged Bonds fund actively managed by Roundhill, while COMB is a Commodities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. TSYW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.

Performance

TSYW vs. COMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF (TSYW) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSYW achieves a -3.63% return, which is significantly lower than COMB's 20.23% return.

TSYW

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -2.75%
• 6M: -4.92%
• YTD: -3.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COMB

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: 1.60%
• 6M: 15.68%
• YTD: 20.23%
• 1Y: 28.78%
• 3Y*: 12.59%
• 5Y*: 10.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSYW vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF	-3.63%	-3.37%
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF	20.23%	0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between TSYW and COMB is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025	-0.34

Return for Risk

TSYW vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSYW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COMB

COMB Risk / Return Rank: 55
COMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
COMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
COMB Omega Ratio Rank: 60
COMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
COMB Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSYW vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF (TSYW) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSYW	COMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.65	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.20	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.30	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.95	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.35	—

Drawdowns

TSYW vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSYW drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, smaller than the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYW and COMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSYW	COMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.79%	-33.50%	+23.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.84%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.93%	-9.32%	+1.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.38%	-12.04%	+7.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.54%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TSYW	COMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.21%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.80%	17.50%	-6.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.80%	16.73%	-5.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.80%	15.15%	-4.35%

TSYW vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSYW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSYW vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison

TSYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.10%, more than COMB's 7.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF	7.53%	9.05%	2.48%	6.57%	30.85%	15.83%	0.07%	1.48%	0.97%	0.20%
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF	9.10%	1.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSYW and COMB in my portfolio?

TSYW and COMB have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TSYW or COMB?

On fees, COMB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSYW or COMB?

COMB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSYW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSYW or COMB?

TSYW has the higher dividend yield at 9.10%, compared with 7.53% for COMB.

What is the main difference between TSYW and COMB?

TSYW is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while COMB is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSYW and 0.25% for COMB.