TSYW vs. COM
TSYW (Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF) and COM (Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSYW is a Leveraged Bonds fund actively managed by Roundhill, while COM is a Commodities fund tracking the Auspice Broad Commodity ER Index. TSYW is actively managed, while COM is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. TSYW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for COM.
Performance
TSYW vs. COM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSYW achieves a -1.25% return, which is significantly lower than COM's 12.48% return.
TSYW
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- -1.25%
- 6M
- -1.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COM
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -3.92%
- YTD
- 12.48%
- 6M
- 12.53%
- 1Y
- 18.69%
- 3Y*
- 6.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.18%
- 10Y*
- —
TSYW vs. COM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF | -1.25% | -3.37% |
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 12.48% | 0.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSYW and COM is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSYW vs. COM — Risk / Return Rank
TSYW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
COM
TSYW vs. COM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF (TSYW) and Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF (COM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSYW | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSYW vs. COM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSYW drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, smaller than the maximum COM drawdown of -15.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYW and COM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSYW | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.79% | -15.95% | +6.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.65% | -6.61% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -6.28% | +2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility
TSYW vs. COM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSYW | COM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.76% | 10.54% | +0.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.76% | 9.53% | +1.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.76% | 9.76% | +1.00% |
TSYW vs. COM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSYW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than COM's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSYW vs. COM - Dividend Comparison
TSYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.20%, more than COM's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COM Direxion Auspice Broad Commodity Strategy ETF | 2.51% | 2.99% | 3.88% | 3.80% | 8.59% | 10.32% | 0.13% | 1.09% | 2.36% | 0.09% |
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF | 8.20% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSYW and COM have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COM is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COM is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSYW.
TSYW has the higher dividend yield at 8.20%, compared with 2.51% for COM.
TSYW is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while COM is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSYW and 0.70% for COM.
Find the right allocation for TSYW and COM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer