TSYW vs. ADME

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

TSYW (Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF) and ADME (Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSYW is a Leveraged Bonds fund actively managed by Roundhill, while ADME is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the Aptus Behavioral Momentum Index. TSYW is actively managed, while ADME is passively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSYW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ADME.

Performance

TSYW vs. ADME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF (TSYW) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSYW achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than ADME's 9.44% return.

TSYW

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -1.54%
• 6M: -3.84%
• YTD: -3.24%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ADME

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 1.41%
• 6M: 7.76%
• YTD: 9.44%
• 1Y: 16.52%
• 3Y*: 16.33%
• 5Y*: 7.30%
• 10Y*: 8.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSYW vs. ADME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF	-3.24%	-3.37%
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF	9.44%	-0.95%

Correlation

The correlation between TSYW and ADME is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025	0.34

Return for Risk

TSYW vs. ADME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSYW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ADME

ADME Risk / Return Rank: 55
ADME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ADME Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
ADME Omega Ratio Rank: 53
ADME Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
ADME Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSYW vs. ADME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF (TSYW) and Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSYW	ADME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.51	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.14	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.16	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.62	—

Drawdowns

TSYW vs. ADME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSYW drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, smaller than the maximum ADME drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYW and ADME.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSYW	ADME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.79%	-27.49%	+17.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.49%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.67%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.43%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.49%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.56%	-1.06%	-6.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.29%	-7.86%	+3.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.87%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TSYW	ADME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.97%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.90%	10.73%	+0.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.90%	13.00%	-2.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.90%	14.43%	-3.53%

TSYW vs. ADME - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSYW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ADME's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSYW vs. ADME - Dividend Comparison

TSYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.92%, more than ADME's 0.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ADME Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF	0.35%	0.38%	0.47%	0.78%	0.73%	0.26%	0.41%	0.70%	0.86%	0.32%	0.69%
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF	8.92%	1.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSYW and ADME in my portfolio?

TSYW and ADME have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TSYW or ADME?

On fees, ADME is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSYW or ADME?

ADME is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSYW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSYW or ADME?

TSYW has the higher dividend yield at 8.92%, compared with 0.35% for ADME.

What is the main difference between TSYW and ADME?

TSYW is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while ADME is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSYW and 0.79% for ADME.