TSYW vs. ACIO
TSYW (Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF) and ACIO (Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSYW is a Leveraged Bonds fund actively managed by Roundhill, while ACIO is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Aptus Capital Advisors. Both are actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSYW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ACIO.
Performance
TSYW vs. ACIO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSYW achieves a -2.14% return, which is significantly lower than ACIO's 7.22% return.
TSYW
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- -2.14%
- 6M
- -4.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACIO
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 6M
- 6.40%
- 1Y
- 15.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.97%
- 5Y*
- 10.18%
- 10Y*
- —
TSYW vs. ACIO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF | -2.14% | -2.56% |
ACIO Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF | 7.22% | 0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSYW and ACIO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSYW vs. ACIO — Risk / Return Rank
TSYW
ACIO
TSYW vs. ACIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF (TSYW) and Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSYW | ACIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.78 | 0.90 | -1.68 |
Drawdowns
TSYW vs. ACIO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSYW drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, smaller than the maximum ACIO drawdown of -14.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYW and ACIO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSYW | ACIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.79% | -14.19% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.51% | -0.64% | -5.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -3.19% | -0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.80% | — |
Volatility
TSYW vs. ACIO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSYW | ACIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 8.26% | +2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 11.05% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 11.64% | -0.86% |
TSYW vs. ACIO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSYW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ACIO's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSYW vs. ACIO - Dividend Comparison
TSYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.44%, more than ACIO's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACIO Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF | 0.38% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 0.72% | 1.51% | 0.61% | 1.02% | 1.32% |
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF | 7.44% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSYW and ACIO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACIO is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACIO is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSYW.
TSYW has the higher dividend yield at 7.44%, compared with 0.38% for ACIO.
TSYW is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while ACIO is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSYW and 0.79% for ACIO.
Find the right allocation for TSYW and ACIO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer