TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L
TSWE.L (VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and IWVL.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - TSWE.L tracks the Solactive World Equal Weight Screened Index while IWVL.L tracks the MSCI World Enhanced Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TSWE.L returned 0.29%/yr vs 12.31%/yr for IWVL.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSWE.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IWVL.L.
Performance
TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSWE.L achieves a 11.74% return, which is significantly lower than IWVL.L's 28.02% return. Over the past 10 years, TSWE.L has underperformed IWVL.L with an annualized return of 0.29%, while IWVL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.
TSWE.L
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -2.30%
- 6M
- 9.45%
- YTD
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 23.91%
- 3Y*
- 18.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- 0.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.36%
IWVL.L
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -4.14%
- 6M
- 24.44%
- YTD
- 28.02%
- 1Y
- 54.62%
- 3Y*
- 25.52%
- 5Y*
- 16.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.04%
TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSWE.L VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 11.74% | 27.64% | 9.78% | 20.41% | -17.42% | 22.23% | 23.38% | -61.63% | -4.83% | 9.00% |
IWVL.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 28.02% | 40.42% | 5.13% | 19.53% | -9.79% | 20.11% | -3.67% | 18.13% | -14.03% | 22.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSWE.L and IWVL.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2014 | 0.81 |
The correlation between TSWE.L and IWVL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSWE.L
IWVL.L
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Financial Services
TSWE.L
IWVL.L
Technology
TSWE.L
IWVL.L
Healthcare
TSWE.L
IWVL.L
Industrials
TSWE.L
IWVL.L
Consumer Cyclical
TSWE.L
IWVL.L
Communication Services
TSWE.L
IWVL.L
Real Estate
TSWE.L
IWVL.L
Basic Materials
TSWE.L
IWVL.L
Consumer Defensive
TSWE.L
IWVL.L
Utilities
TSWE.L
IWVL.L
Energy
TSWE.L
IWVL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L — Risk / Return Rank
TSWE.L
IWVL.L
TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TSWE.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSWE.L | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.56 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 6.22 | -3.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.48 | 20.75 | -12.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSWE.L drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, which is greater than IWVL.L's maximum drawdown of -39.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSWE.L and IWVL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSWE.L | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.86% | -39.30% | -37.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.48% | -8.74% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.43% | -14.46% | -1.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.31% | -26.55% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.86% | -39.30% | -37.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.46% | -5.53% | -14.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.89% | -7.44% | -24.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 2.62% | +0.19% |
Volatility
TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TSWE.L) is 3.74%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that TSWE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWVL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSWE.L | IWVL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 6.05% | -2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.99% | 14.89% | -1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.34% | 17.07% | -1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 16.23% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.68% | 16.90% | +10.78% |
TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSWE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IWVL.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L - Dividend Comparison
TSWE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, while IWVL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWVL.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSWE.L VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.84% | 1.89% | 2.28% | 2.15% | 2.33% | 4.41% | 7.06% | 9.31% | 2.86% | 2.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSWE.L and IWVL.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSWE.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSWE.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IWVL.L.
TSWE.L tracks Solactive World Equal Weight Screened Index, while IWVL.L tracks MSCI World Enhanced Value Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TSWE.L and 0.25% for IWVL.L.
Find the right allocation for TSWE.L and IWVL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer