PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TSWE.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSWE.L achieves a 11.74% return, which is significantly lower than IWVL.L's 28.02% return. Over the past 10 years, TSWE.L has underperformed IWVL.L with an annualized return of 0.29%, while IWVL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.


TSWE.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
-2.30%
6M
9.45%
YTD
11.74%
1Y
23.91%
3Y*
18.01%
5Y*
10.47%
10Y*
0.29%
ALL TIME*
2.36%

IWVL.L

1D
0.46%
1M
-4.14%
6M
24.44%
YTD
28.02%
1Y
54.62%
3Y*
25.52%
5Y*
16.31%
10Y*
12.31%
ALL TIME*
10.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSWE.L
VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
11.74%27.64%9.78%20.41%-17.42%22.23%23.38%-61.63%-4.83%9.00%
IWVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
28.02%40.42%5.13%19.53%-9.79%20.11%-3.67%18.13%-14.03%22.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TSWE.L and IWVL.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2014

0.81

The correlation between TSWE.L and IWVL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TSWE.L
IWVL.L

Financial Services

30.9%
15.0%

Technology

23.7%
35.5%

Healthcare

12.6%
8.3%

Industrials

11.4%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
8.3%

Communication Services

6.6%
7.4%

Real Estate

2.5%
1.6%

Basic Materials

2.4%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.5%
4.8%

Utilities

1.1%
2.4%

Energy

0.4%
3.4%

Financial Services

TSWE.L
30.9%
IWVL.L
15.0%

Technology

TSWE.L
23.7%
IWVL.L
35.5%

Healthcare

TSWE.L
12.6%
IWVL.L
8.3%

Industrials

TSWE.L
11.4%
IWVL.L
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

TSWE.L
7.1%
IWVL.L
8.3%

Communication Services

TSWE.L
6.6%
IWVL.L
7.4%

Real Estate

TSWE.L
2.5%
IWVL.L
1.6%

Basic Materials

TSWE.L
2.4%
IWVL.L
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

TSWE.L
1.5%
IWVL.L
4.8%

Utilities

TSWE.L
1.1%
IWVL.L
2.4%

Energy

TSWE.L
0.4%
IWVL.L
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSWE.L
TSWE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TSWE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSWE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSWE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TSWE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSWE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

IWVL.L
IWVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IWVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TSWE.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSWE.LIWVL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.56

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

6.22

-3.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.48

20.75

-12.27

TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSWE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the IWVL.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSWE.L and IWVL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSWE.L drawdown since its inception was -76.86%, which is greater than IWVL.L's maximum drawdown of -39.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSWE.L and IWVL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSWE.LIWVL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.86%

-39.30%

-37.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.48%

-8.74%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.43%

-14.46%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.31%

-26.55%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.86%

-39.30%

-37.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.46%

-5.53%

-14.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.89%

-7.44%

-24.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.62%

+0.19%

Volatility

TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TSWE.L) is 3.74%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWVL.L) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that TSWE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWVL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSWE.LIWVL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

6.05%

-2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.99%

14.89%

-1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.34%

17.07%

-1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

16.23%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.68%

16.90%

+10.78%

TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSWE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IWVL.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TSWE.L vs. IWVL.L - Dividend Comparison

TSWE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, while IWVL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSWE.L
VanEck World Equal Weight Screened UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.84%1.89%2.28%2.15%2.33%4.41%7.06%9.31%2.86%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSWE.L and IWVL.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSWE.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSWE.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IWVL.L.

TSWE.L tracks Solactive World Equal Weight Screened Index, while IWVL.L tracks MSCI World Enhanced Value Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TSWE.L and 0.25% for IWVL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSWE.L and IWVL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer