PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSWE.AS vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSWE.AS vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TSWE.AS) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TSWE.AS is traded in EUR, while SCHD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSWE.AS achieves a 16.96% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 22.40% return. Over the past 10 years, TSWE.AS has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 15.94%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.59% annualized return.


TSWE.AS

1D
0.87%
1M
3.99%
YTD
16.96%
6M
17.43%
1Y
30.73%
3Y*
18.47%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
15.94%

SCHD

1D
0.69%
1M
0.90%
YTD
22.40%
6M
21.71%
1Y
29.70%
3Y*
13.07%
5Y*
9.77%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSWE.AS vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSWE.AS
VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF
16.96%13.10%16.86%16.01%-13.44%32.44%11.32%34.59%0.23%14.40%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
22.40%-8.04%19.03%1.41%2.74%39.59%5.55%30.17%-1.13%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between TSWE.AS and SCHD is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2013

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between TSWE.AS and SCHD has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSWE.AS vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSWE.AS
TSWE.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TSWE.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSWE.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSWE.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TSWE.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSWE.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSWE.AS vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TSWE.AS) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSWE.ASSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

7.18

-3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.09

18.01

-2.92

TSWE.AS vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSWE.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSWE.AS and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSWE.AS vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSWE.AS drawdown since its inception was -75.58%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSWE.AS and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSWE.ASSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.58%

-32.28%

-43.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.97%

-4.15%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.53%

-21.40%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.53%

-21.40%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.93%

-32.28%

-0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-0.10%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.13%

-4.41%

-31.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

1.65%

+0.37%

Volatility

TSWE.AS vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TSWE.AS) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.53%. This indicates that TSWE.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSWE.ASSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

2.53%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

8.54%

+1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

11.62%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.74%

14.58%

-0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.02%

17.44%

-2.42%

TSWE.AS vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSWE.AS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TSWE.AS vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

TSWE.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than SCHD's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.28%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
TSWE.AS
VanEck Sustainable World Equal Weight UCITS ETF
1.77%1.94%1.89%1.92%2.05%3.60%6.51%8.08%8.48%7.21%6.39%6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSWE.AS and SCHD have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for TSWE.AS.

TSWE.AS is categorized as Global Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. TSWE.AS tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TSWE.AS and 0.06% for SCHD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSWE.AS and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer