PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSU.TO vs. BAM.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TSU.TO vs. BAM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Trisura Group Ltd. (TSU.TO) and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSU.TO achieves a -0.16% return, which is significantly higher than BAM.TO's -6.38% return.


TSU.TO

1D
0.24%
1M
3.95%
YTD
-0.16%
6M
6.79%
1Y
6.33%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*

BAM.TO

1D
1.48%
1M
-1.81%
YTD
-6.38%
6M
-9.11%
1Y
-7.86%
3Y*
18.57%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSU.TO vs. BAM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TSU.TO
Trisura Group Ltd.
-0.16%9.59%14.65%-24.93%5.57%
BAM.TO
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd
-6.38%-4.85%51.69%42.64%33.69%

Correlation

The correlation between TSU.TO and BAM.TO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2022

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TSU.TO:

CA$2.07B

BAM.TO:

CA$107.08B

EPS

TSU.TO:

CA$3.11

BAM.TO:

$1.54

PE Ratio

TSU.TO:

13.73

BAM.TO:

30.56

PEG Ratio

TSU.TO:

0.34

BAM.TO:

0.05

PS Ratio

TSU.TO:

0.65

BAM.TO:

15.53

PB Ratio

TSU.TO:

2.18

BAM.TO:

8.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

TSU.TO:

CA$3.19B

BAM.TO:

$4.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TSU.TO:

CA$2.49B

BAM.TO:

$3.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

TSU.TO:

CA$208.91M

BAM.TO:

$3.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSU.TO vs. BAM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSU.TO
TSU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TSU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TSU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

BAM.TO
BAM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BAM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BAM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSU.TO vs. BAM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trisura Group Ltd. (TSU.TO) and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSU.TOBAM.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.96

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.31

-0.35

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.53

-0.64

+1.18

TSU.TO vs. BAM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is higher than the BAM.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSU.TO and BAM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSU.TO vs. BAM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSU.TO drawdown since its inception was -40.06%, which is greater than BAM.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSU.TO and BAM.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSU.TOBAM.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.06%

-30.80%

-9.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.33%

-30.31%

+11.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.85%

-30.80%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.05%

-21.54%

+7.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.34%

-9.24%

-5.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.44%

16.31%

-5.87%

Volatility

TSU.TO vs. BAM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Trisura Group Ltd. (TSU.TO) is 4.11%, while Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) has a volatility of 9.78%. This indicates that TSU.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSU.TOBAM.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

9.78%

-5.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.80%

22.05%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.85%

28.95%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.08%

41.28%

-8.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.66%

41.28%

-7.62%

Dividends

TSU.TO vs. BAM.TO - Dividend Comparison

TSU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BAM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%.


PositionTTM202520242023
BAM.TO
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd
3.93%3.40%2.67%3.27%
TSU.TO
Trisura Group Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TSU.TO vs. BAM.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trisura Group Ltd. and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-500.00M0.00500.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
806.81M
1.32B
(TSU.TO) Total Revenue
(BAM.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TSU.TO values in CAD, BAM.TO values in USD

TSU.TO vs. BAM.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Trisura Group Ltd. and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
80.7%
Portfolio components
TSU.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trisura Group Ltd. reported a gross profit of 806.81M and revenue of 806.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

BAM.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.06B and revenue of 1.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.7%.

TSU.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trisura Group Ltd. reported an operating income of 48.61M and revenue of 806.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.

BAM.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd reported an operating income of 595.08M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.2%.

TSU.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trisura Group Ltd. reported a net income of 37.41M and revenue of 806.81M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.

BAM.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd reported a net income of 606.89M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in a net margin of 46.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TSU.TO and BAM.TO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSU.TO and BAM.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer