PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAM.TO vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAM.TO vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BAM.TO is traded in CAD, while BRK-B is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-B values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAM.TO achieves a -5.47% return, which is significantly lower than BRK-B's 0.05% return.


BAM.TO

1D
-1.67%
1M
0.23%
6M
-6.32%
YTD
-5.47%
1Y
-17.23%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
30.11%

BRK-B

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.21%
6M
0.52%
YTD
0.05%
1Y
5.82%
3Y*
14.77%
5Y*
14.19%
10Y*
13.80%
ALL TIME*
10.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAM.TO vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BAM.TO
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd
-5.47%-4.85%51.69%42.64%33.69%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.05%5.83%37.85%12.71%-3.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BAM.TO and BRK-B is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2022

0.21

The correlation between BAM.TO and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAM.TO:

CA$106.31B

BRK-B:

$1.06T

EPS

BAM.TO:

$1.54

BRK-B:

$33.62

PE Ratio

BAM.TO:

30.79

BRK-B:

14.61

PEG Ratio

BAM.TO:

0.05

BRK-B:

0.57

PS Ratio

BAM.TO:

15.64

BRK-B:

2.82

PB Ratio

BAM.TO:

8.98

BRK-B:

1.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAM.TO:

$4.94B

BRK-B:

$375.39B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAM.TO:

$3.48B

BRK-B:

$94.36B

EBITDA (TTM)

BAM.TO:

$3.14B

BRK-B:

$71.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAM.TO vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAM.TO
BAM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BAM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BAM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAM.TO vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAM.TOBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.08

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

0.49

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

1.04

-2.02

BAM.TO vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAM.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAM.TO and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAM.TO vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAM.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -41.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAM.TO and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAM.TOBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.80%

-41.13%

+10.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.31%

-12.05%

-18.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.80%

-17.69%

-13.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.78%

-10.39%

-10.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.58%

-9.95%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.59%

5.60%

+11.99%

Volatility

BAM.TO vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 4.54%. This indicates that BAM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAM.TOBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.31%

4.54%

+3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.22%

11.76%

+10.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.80%

15.51%

+13.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.96%

17.99%

+22.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.96%

20.40%

+20.56%

Dividends

BAM.TO vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

BAM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BAM.TO
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd
3.89%3.40%2.67%3.27%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BAM.TO vs. BRK-B - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Asset Management Ltd and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.32B
93.68B
(BAM.TO) Total Revenue
(BRK-B) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BAM.TO vs. BRK-B - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brookfield Asset Management Ltd and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
80.7%
28.8%
Portfolio components
BAM.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.06B and revenue of 1.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.7%.

BRK-B - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.98B and revenue of 93.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.

BAM.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd reported an operating income of 595.08M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.2%.

BRK-B - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported an operating income of 15.05B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

BAM.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd reported a net income of 606.89M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in a net margin of 46.1%.

BRK-B - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a net income of 10.18B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BAM.TO and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAM.TO and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer