TSU.TO vs. MFC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Trisura Group Ltd. (TSU.TO) and Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TSU.TO or MFC.TO.
Key characteristics
| TSU.TO | MFC.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.32% | 59.00% |
| 1Y Return | 29.95% | 82.77% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.27% | 27.19% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 34.15% | 16.51% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.18 | 4.29 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.85 | 6.10 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.22 | 1.84 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.84 | 0.82 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.46 | 32.10 |
| Ulcer Index | 6.81% | 2.57% |
| Daily Std Dev | 25.68% | 19.19% |
| Max Drawdown | -77.34% | -100.00% |
| Current Drawdown | -16.95% | -99.99% |
Fundamentals
| TSU.TO | MFC.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$1.93B | CA$79.50B |
| EPS | CA$2.29 | CA$2.84 |
| PE Ratio | 17.72 | 15.98 |
| PEG Ratio | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$2.35B | CA$45.57B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$2.35B | CA$30.97B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$2.47M | CA$125.00M |
Correlation
The correlation between TSU.TO and MFC.TO is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
TSU.TO vs. MFC.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, TSU.TO achieves a 19.32% return, which is significantly lower than MFC.TO's 59.00% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TSU.TO vs. MFC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trisura Group Ltd. (TSU.TO) and Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TSU.TO vs. MFC.TO - Dividend Comparison
TSU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MFC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSU.TO Trisura Group Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFC.TO Manulife Financial Corporation | 2.53% | 3.67% | 4.21% | 3.88% | 4.93% | 2.86% | 3.64% | 2.60% | 2.36% | 3.28% | 3.12% | 2.39% |
Drawdowns
TSU.TO vs. MFC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSU.TO drawdown since its inception was -77.34%, smaller than the maximum MFC.TO drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSU.TO and MFC.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TSU.TO vs. MFC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Trisura Group Ltd. (TSU.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.95% compared to Manulife Financial Corporation (MFC.TO) at 7.00%. This indicates that TSU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
TSU.TO vs. MFC.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trisura Group Ltd. and Manulife Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities