TSSD vs. FOWF
TSSD (Truth Social American Security & Defense ETF) and FOWF (Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSSD is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the Truth Social - Yorkville American Security & Defense Index, while FOWF is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSSD charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FOWF.
Performance
TSSD vs. FOWF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSSD achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly higher than FOWF's 10.78% return.
TSSD
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FOWF
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- YTD
- 10.78%
- 1Y
- 17.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSSD vs. FOWF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSSD Truth Social American Security & Defense ETF | 17.28% | -1.16% |
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 10.78% | -0.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSSD and FOWF is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSSD vs. FOWF — Risk / Return Rank
TSSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FOWF
TSSD vs. FOWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Truth Social American Security & Defense ETF (TSSD) and Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSSD | FOWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSSD vs. FOWF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSSD drawdown since its inception was -12.02%, roughly equal to the maximum FOWF drawdown of -12.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSSD and FOWF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSSD | FOWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -12.29% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.62% | +1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -2.15% | -3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.33% | — |
Volatility
TSSD vs. FOWF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSSD | FOWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 14.48% | +9.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 16.95% | +7.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 16.95% | +7.47% |
TSSD vs. FOWF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSSD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FOWF's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSSD vs. FOWF - Dividend Comparison
TSSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than FOWF's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FOWF Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF | 0.75% | 0.79% |
TSSD Truth Social American Security & Defense ETF | 0.09% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSSD and FOWF have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FOWF is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FOWF is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TSSD.
FOWF has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.09% for TSSD.
TSSD is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while FOWF is Industrials Equities. TSSD tracks Truth Social - Yorkville American Security & Defense Index, while FOWF tracks Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index. They also come from different issuers: Truth Social Funds and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TSSD and 0.49% for FOWF.
Find the right allocation for TSSD and FOWF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer