TSRS vs. RDOG
TSRS (Truth Social American Red State REITs ETF) and RDOG (ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF) are both REIT funds - TSRS tracks the Truth Social - Yorkville American Red State REITs Index while RDOG tracks the S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSRS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RDOG.
Performance
TSRS vs. RDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSRS achieves a 14.71% return, which is significantly lower than RDOG's 19.65% return.
TSRS
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- 6M
- 12.04%
- YTD
- 14.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
RDOG
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 15.03%
- YTD
- 19.65%
- 1Y
- 20.39%
- 3Y*
- 10.17%
- 5Y*
- 2.44%
- 10Y*
- 3.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $49.02K | $70.87K | $60.95K | |
| $17.48K | $17.31K | $21.52K |
TSRS vs. RDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSRS Truth Social American Red State REITs ETF | 14.71% | -0.30% |
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 19.65% | 0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSRS and RDOG is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSRS vs. RDOG — Risk / Return Rank
TSRS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RDOG
TSRS vs. RDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Truth Social American Red State REITs ETF (TSRS) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSRS | RDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.04 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.65 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSRS vs. RDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSRS drawdown since its inception was -8.32%, smaller than the maximum RDOG drawdown of -67.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSRS and RDOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSRS | RDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.32% | -67.59% | +59.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.86% | -2.00% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -12.18% | +10.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.10% | — |
Volatility
TSRS vs. RDOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSRS | RDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.00% | 14.72% | -0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 19.79% | -5.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.00% | 23.05% | -9.05% |
TSRS vs. RDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSRS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RDOG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSRS vs. RDOG - Dividend Comparison
TSRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than RDOG's 6.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 6.10% | 6.91% | 6.11% | 7.07% | 5.25% | 3.11% | 5.12% | 3.10% | 3.13% | 3.64% | 3.66% | 3.43% |
TSRS Truth Social American Red State REITs ETF | 2.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSRS and RDOG have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TSRS.
RDOG has the higher dividend yield at 6.10%, compared with 2.14% for TSRS.
TSRS tracks Truth Social - Yorkville American Red State REITs Index, while RDOG tracks S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: Truth Social Funds and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TSRS and 0.35% for RDOG.
Find the right allocation for TSRS and RDOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer