TSPA vs. DFIV

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

TSPA (T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF) and DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSPA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while DFIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSPA returned 21.63%/yr vs 23.38%/yr for DFIV. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSPA charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DFIV.

Performance

TSPA vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSPA achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly lower than DFIV's 12.20% return.

TSPA

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 9.54%
• 6M: 10.14%
• 1Y: 25.57%
• 3Y*: 21.63%
• 5Y*: 14.00%
• 10Y*: —

DFIV

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 12.20%
• 6M: 13.92%
• 1Y: 34.38%
• 3Y*: 23.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSPA vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TSPA T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF	9.54%	16.44%	26.37%	29.95%	-18.70%	7.45%
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	12.20%	45.36%	7.26%	17.75%	-3.70%	0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between TSPA and DFIV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2021	0.66

The correlation between TSPA and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

TSPA vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TSPA	DFIV
Technology	35.9%	3.2%
Financial Services	12.2%	32.4%
Communication Services	11.3%	4.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	10.0%
Healthcare	8.6%	4.9%
Industrials	8.0%	9.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	4.9%
Energy	3.6%	15.3%
Utilities	2.4%	2.2%
Basic Materials	1.8%	11.4%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.7%

Return for Risk

TSPA vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSPA

TSPA Risk / Return Rank: 67
TSPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
TSPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
TSPA Omega Ratio Rank: 68
TSPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
TSPA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

DFIV

DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 82
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 83
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSPA vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSPA	DFIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.39	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	3.26	-0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.43	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	3.48	-0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.98	13.34	-1.36

TSPA vs. DFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the DFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSPA and DFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSPA vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSPA drawdown since its inception was -24.72%, roughly equal to the maximum DFIV drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSPA and DFIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSPA	DFIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.72%	-25.42%	+0.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.24%	-9.66%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.04%	-14.72%	-4.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.25%	-0.43%	-1.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.47%	-4.46%	-1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	2.52%	-0.48%

Volatility

TSPA vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) have volatilities of 4.52% and 4.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSPA	DFIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	4.50%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.15%	11.46%	-1.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.76%	14.10%	-1.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.05%	16.66%	+0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.03%	16.66%	+0.37%

TSPA vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSPA has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSPA vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison

TSPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than DFIV's 2.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	2.54%	2.92%	3.88%	3.93%	3.84%	2.30%
TSPA T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF	0.57%	0.62%	0.50%	0.41%	1.16%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSPA and DFIV in my portfolio?

TSPA and DFIV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSPA or DFIV?

TSPA has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to DFIV (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSPA dropped -24.72% vs DFIV's -25.42%.

Which ETF is better, TSPA or DFIV?

On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.38% vs 21.63% for TSPA. On fees, DFIV is cheaper at 0.27% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSPA or DFIV?

Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.38% return vs 21.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSPA or DFIV?

DFIV is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for TSPA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSPA or DFIV?

DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.57% for TSPA.

What is the main difference between TSPA and DFIV?

TSPA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DFIV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for TSPA and 0.27% for DFIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.