TSOL vs. EZPZ
TSOL (21Shares Solana ETF) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. TSOL is actively managed, while EZPZ is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSOL charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.
Performance
TSOL vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSOL achieves a -41.49% return, which is significantly lower than EZPZ's -28.21% return.
TSOL
- 1D
- -4.53%
- 1M
- -14.54%
- YTD
- -41.49%
- 6M
- -48.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ
- 1D
- -3.03%
- 1M
- -18.55%
- YTD
- -28.21%
- 6M
- -33.71%
- 1Y
- -39.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSOL vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSOL 21Shares Solana ETF | -41.49% | -6.28% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -28.21% | -3.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSOL and EZPZ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSOL vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank
TSOL
EZPZ
TSOL vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Solana ETF (TSOL) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSOL | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.95 | -0.61 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
TSOL vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSOL drawdown since its inception was -50.75%, roughly equal to the maximum EZPZ drawdown of -52.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSOL and EZPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSOL | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.75% | -52.38% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.75% | -51.59% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.35% | -21.72% | -7.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.44% | — |
Volatility
TSOL vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSOL | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.70% | 46.83% | +24.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.70% | 47.65% | +24.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.70% | 47.65% | +24.05% |
TSOL vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSOL has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TSOL vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison
TSOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.78%, while EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% |
TSOL 21Shares Solana ETF | 4.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSOL and EZPZ have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for TSOL.
TSOL has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.
They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for TSOL and 0.19% for EZPZ.
Find the right allocation for TSOL and EZPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer