TSNF vs. XLK
TSNF (Truth Social American Next Frontiers ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - TSNF tracks the Truth Social - Yorkville American Next Frontiers Index while XLK tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TSNF charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
TSNF vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSNF achieves a 27.70% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 25.74% return.
TSNF
- 1D
- -3.35%
- 1M
- -6.52%
- 6M
- 24.18%
- YTD
- 27.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- -7.86%
- 6M
- 25.45%
- YTD
- 25.74%
- 1Y
- 41.30%
- 3Y*
- 28.53%
- 5Y*
- 20.13%
- 10Y*
- 24.89%
TSNF vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSNF Truth Social American Next Frontiers ETF | 27.70% | -1.68% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 25.74% | -1.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSNF and XLK is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSNF vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
TSNF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XLK
TSNF vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Truth Social American Next Frontiers ETF (TSNF) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSNF | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.72 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSNF vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSNF drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSNF and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSNF | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.59% | -82.05% | +63.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.18% | -8.78% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.62% | -34.87% | +29.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.12% | — |
Volatility
TSNF vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSNF | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.34% | 24.04% | +10.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.34% | 25.49% | +8.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.34% | 24.75% | +9.59% |
TSNF vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSNF has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSNF vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
TSNF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSNF Truth Social American Next Frontiers ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.44% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSNF and XLK have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TSNF.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for TSNF.
TSNF tracks Truth Social - Yorkville American Next Frontiers Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Truth Social Funds and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TSNF and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for TSNF and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer