PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSMZ vs. TSLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSMZ vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMZ achieves a -38.97% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's -0.13% return.


TSMZ

1D
-0.98%
1M
-15.14%
YTD
-38.97%
6M
-41.14%
1Y
-59.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLZ

1D
-2.07%
1M
6.09%
YTD
-0.13%
6M
17.45%
1Y
-63.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSMZ vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSMZ
Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares
-38.97%-41.91%-11.25%
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
-0.13%-75.98%-77.48%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMZ and TSLZ is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSMZ vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMZ
TSMZ Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
TSMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLZ
TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMZ vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSMZTSLZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.70

0.89

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

-0.88

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.65

-1.12

-0.53

TSMZ vs. TSLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMZ Sharpe Ratio is -1.58, which is lower than the TSLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMZ and TSLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSMZ vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMZ drawdown since its inception was -73.32%, smaller than the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMZ and TSLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSMZTSLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.32%

-99.11%

+25.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.01%

-72.88%

+13.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.32%

-98.95%

+25.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.61%

-75.67%

+37.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.95%

57.09%

-21.14%

Volatility

TSMZ vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) is 13.95%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) has a volatility of 25.49%. This indicates that TSMZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSMZTSLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.95%

25.49%

-11.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.48%

56.21%

-26.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.56%

87.45%

-49.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.91%

116.74%

-75.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.91%

116.74%

-75.83%

TSMZ vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMZ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSMZ vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison

TSMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than TSLZ's 0.69% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
0.69%0.69%2.08%12.15%
TSMZ
Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares
5.74%4.88%0.86%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSMZ and TSLZ have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLZ has higher volatility (25.49%) compared to TSMZ (13.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMZ dropped -73.32% vs TSLZ's -99.11%.

On 1-year performance, TSMZ leads with -59.11% vs -63.91% for TSLZ. On fees, TSMZ is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, TSMZ has been the lower-risk option at 13.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMZ has performed better with a -59.11% return vs -63.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSMZ is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLZ.

TSMZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 0.69% for TSLZ.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TSMZ and 1.05% for TSLZ.

TSLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.73 vs -1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSMZ and TSLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer