TSMZ vs. SPDN
TSMZ (Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares) and SPDN (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion. TSMZ is actively managed, while SPDN is passively managed. Over the past year, TSMZ returned -48.22% vs -12.79% for SPDN. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TSMZ charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SPDN.
Performance
TSMZ vs. SPDN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSMZ achieves a -31.34% return, which is significantly lower than SPDN's -6.42% return.
TSMZ
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 5.88%
- 6M
- -24.87%
- YTD
- -31.34%
- 1Y
- -48.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -43.42%
SPDN
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- -6.42%
- 1Y
- -12.79%
- 3Y*
- -10.75%
- 5Y*
- -7.84%
- 10Y*
- -12.18%
- ALL TIME*
- -12.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $433.42M | $387.95M | $422.31M | |
| $787.65K | $1.02M | $750.23K |
TSMZ vs. SPDN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSMZ Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares | -31.34% | -41.91% | -11.25% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | -6.42% | -11.09% | -1.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSMZ and SPDN is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024 | 0.62 |
The correlation between TSMZ and SPDN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSMZ vs. SPDN — Risk / Return Rank
TSMZ
SPDN
TSMZ vs. SPDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSMZ | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 0.87 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.71 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | -1.27 | -0.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSMZ vs. SPDN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSMZ drawdown since its inception was -74.02%, roughly equal to the maximum SPDN drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMZ and SPDN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSMZ | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.02% | -75.31% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.52% | -15.93% | -40.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.99% | -74.80% | +4.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.58% | -48.93% | +8.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.46% | 8.90% | +26.56% |
Volatility
TSMZ vs. SPDN - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares (TSMZ) has a higher volatility of 14.51% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) at 3.55%. This indicates that TSMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSMZ | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.51% | 3.55% | +10.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.33% | 10.15% | +23.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.76% | 12.98% | +27.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.96% | 16.97% | +24.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.96% | 18.03% | +23.93% |
TSMZ vs. SPDN - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSMZ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSMZ vs. SPDN - Dividend Comparison
TSMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than SPDN's 3.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 3.32% | 4.06% | 5.32% | 5.84% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.89% | 1.24% | 0.42% |
TSMZ Direxion Daily TSM Bear 1X Shares | 4.39% | 4.88% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSMZ and SPDN have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMZ has higher volatility (14.51%) compared to SPDN (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMZ dropped -74.02% vs SPDN's -75.31%.
On 1-year performance, SPDN leads with -12.79% vs -48.22% for TSMZ. On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPDN has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPDN has performed better with a -12.79% return vs -48.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for TSMZ.
TSMZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.39%, compared with 3.32% for SPDN.
Their fees differ too: 0.98% for TSMZ and 0.50% for SPDN.
SPDN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.88 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSMZ and SPDN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer