TSMY vs. MAGY
TSMY (YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF) and MAGY (Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSMY returned 92.13% vs 13.34% for MAGY. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
TSMY vs. MAGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSMY achieves a 37.04% return, which is significantly higher than MAGY's -1.50% return.
TSMY
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 7.48%
- YTD
- 37.04%
- 6M
- 39.21%
- 1Y
- 92.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGY
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- -1.50%
- 6M
- -0.71%
- 1Y
- 13.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMY vs. MAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 37.04% | 70.17% |
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | -1.50% | 26.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSMY and MAGY is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025 | 0.54 |
The correlation between TSMY and MAGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSMY vs. MAGY — Risk / Return Rank
TSMY
MAGY
TSMY vs. MAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSMY | MAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.21 | 0.93 | +2.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.86 | 1.29 | +2.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.18 | +0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.98 | 0.94 | +5.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.18 | 3.11 | +19.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSMY | MAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.21 | 0.93 | +2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.56 | 1.53 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
TSMY vs. MAGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSMY drawdown since its inception was -31.15%, which is greater than MAGY's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMY and MAGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSMY | MAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.15% | -14.29% | -16.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.50% | -14.29% | -1.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -3.64% | +2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -2.69% | -2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 4.29% | -0.12% |
Volatility
TSMY vs. MAGY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) has a higher volatility of 9.52% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF (MAGY) at 3.67%. This indicates that TSMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSMY | MAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.52% | 3.67% | +5.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.68% | 11.29% | +11.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.87% | 14.38% | +14.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.22% | 14.57% | +18.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.22% | 14.57% | +18.65% |
TSMY vs. MAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TSMY and MAGY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
TSMY vs. MAGY - Dividend Comparison
TSMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.19%, more than MAGY's 37.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF | 37.35% | 23.38% | 0.00% |
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 52.19% | 56.76% | 13.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSMY and MAGY have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMY has higher volatility (9.52%) compared to MAGY (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMY dropped -31.15% vs MAGY's -14.29%.
On 1-year performance, TSMY leads with 92.13% vs 13.34% for MAGY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, MAGY has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMY has performed better with a 92.13% return vs 13.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSMY and MAGY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
TSMY has the higher dividend yield at 52.19%, compared with 37.35% for MAGY.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill.
TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSMY and MAGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer