TSMX vs. QTJL
TSMX (Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSMX returned 295.18% vs 20.52% for QTJL. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSMX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
TSMX vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSMX achieves a 85.80% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 7.15% return.
TSMX
- 1D
- -4.27%
- 1M
- 15.97%
- YTD
- 85.80%
- 6M
- 94.81%
- 1Y
- 295.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMX vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares | 85.80% | 81.48% | 14.76% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 7.15% | 21.07% | 6.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSMX and QTJL is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024 | 0.61 |
The correlation between TSMX and QTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
TSMX vs. QTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSMX
QTJL
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TSMX
QTJL
Basic Materials
TSMX
-
QTJL
Communication Services
TSMX
-
QTJL
Consumer Cyclical
TSMX
-
QTJL
Consumer Defensive
TSMX
-
QTJL
Energy
TSMX
-
QTJL
Financial Services
TSMX
-
QTJL
Healthcare
TSMX
-
QTJL
Industrials
TSMX
-
QTJL
Real Estate
TSMX
-
QTJL
Utilities
TSMX
-
QTJL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSMX vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
TSMX
QTJL
TSMX vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares (TSMX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSMX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.42 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.51 | 3.08 | +5.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.80 | 16.23 | +11.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSMX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.15 | 2.06 | +2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.57 | 0.52 | +1.05 |
Drawdowns
TSMX vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSMX drawdown since its inception was -63.80%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMX and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSMX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.80% | -33.40% | -30.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.93% | -6.68% | -28.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.27% | -0.01% | -4.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -7.94% | -7.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.68% | 1.27% | +9.41% |
Volatility
TSMX vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares (TSMX) has a higher volatility of 22.91% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.31%. This indicates that TSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSMX | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.91% | 0.31% | +22.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.45% | 7.61% | +46.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.63% | 10.01% | +61.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.93% | 20.42% | +60.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.93% | 20.42% | +60.51% |
TSMX vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSMX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSMX vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
TSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares | 4.44% | 8.01% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSMX and QTJL have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMX has higher volatility (22.91%) compared to QTJL (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMX dropped -63.80% vs QTJL's -33.40%.
On 1-year performance, TSMX leads with 295.18% vs 20.52% for QTJL. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMX has performed better with a 295.18% return vs 20.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSMX.
TSMX has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSMX and 0.79% for QTJL.
TSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.15 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSMX and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer