TSMX vs. GDXU
TSMX (Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares) and GDXU (MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TSMX is actively managed, while GDXU is passively managed. Over the past year, TSMX returned 295.18% vs 72.31% for GDXU. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSMX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for GDXU.
Performance
TSMX vs. GDXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSMX achieves a 85.80% return, which is significantly higher than GDXU's -43.81% return.
TSMX
- 1D
- -4.27%
- 1M
- 15.97%
- YTD
- 85.80%
- 6M
- 94.81%
- 1Y
- 295.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXU
- 1D
- -10.63%
- 1M
- -11.26%
- YTD
- -43.81%
- 6M
- -33.96%
- 1Y
- 72.31%
- 3Y*
- 46.61%
- 5Y*
- -10.91%
- 10Y*
- —
TSMX vs. GDXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares | 85.80% | 81.48% | 14.76% |
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN | -43.81% | 796.47% | -41.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSMX and GDXU is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024 | 0.18 |
TSMX vs. GDXU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSMX
GDXU
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
TSMX
GDXU
-
Basic Materials
TSMX
-
GDXU
Communication Services
TSMX
-
GDXU
-
Consumer Cyclical
TSMX
-
GDXU
-
Consumer Defensive
TSMX
-
GDXU
-
Energy
TSMX
-
GDXU
-
Financial Services
TSMX
-
GDXU
-
Healthcare
TSMX
-
GDXU
-
Industrials
TSMX
-
GDXU
-
Real Estate
TSMX
-
GDXU
-
Utilities
TSMX
-
GDXU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSMX vs. GDXU — Risk / Return Rank
TSMX
GDXU
TSMX vs. GDXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares (TSMX) and MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSMX | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.21 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.51 | 0.98 | +7.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.80 | 2.00 | +25.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSMX | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.15 | 0.53 | +3.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.57 | -0.09 | +1.66 |
Drawdowns
TSMX vs. GDXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSMX drawdown since its inception was -63.80%, smaller than the maximum GDXU drawdown of -94.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMX and GDXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSMX | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.80% | -94.39% | +30.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.93% | -73.99% | +39.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -73.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -92.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.27% | -73.92% | +69.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.85% | -69.77% | +53.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.68% | 36.23% | -25.55% |
Volatility
TSMX vs. GDXU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares (TSMX) is 22.91%, while MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN (GDXU) has a volatility of 46.45%. This indicates that TSMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSMX | GDXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.91% | 46.45% | -23.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.45% | 118.07% | -63.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.63% | 137.57% | -65.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.93% | 110.85% | -29.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.93% | 110.02% | -29.09% |
TSMX vs. GDXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSMX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSMX vs. GDXU - Dividend Comparison
TSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, while GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares | 4.44% | 8.01% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSMX and GDXU have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXU has higher volatility (46.45%) compared to TSMX (22.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMX dropped -63.80% vs GDXU's -94.39%.
On 1-year performance, TSMX leads with 295.18% vs 72.31% for GDXU. On fees, GDXU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TSMX has been the lower-risk option at 22.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMX has performed better with a 295.18% return vs 72.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDXU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSMX.
TSMX has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 0.00% for GDXU.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSMX and 0.95% for GDXU.
TSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.15 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSMX and GDXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer