PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSMU vs. WTIU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TSMU vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TSMU vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSMU
GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF
17.44%74.83%3.04%
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
113.23%-17.13%-23.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMU achieves a 17.44% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 113.23% return.


TSMU

1D
1.99%
1M
-16.60%
YTD
17.44%
6M
21.67%
1Y
210.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WTIU

1D
-11.84%
1M
17.12%
YTD
113.23%
6M
89.84%
1Y
46.84%
3Y*
2.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TSMU vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TSMU vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMU
TSMU Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
TSMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMU Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMU Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

WTIU
WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMU vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSMUWTIUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.75

0.58

+2.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.96

1.22

+1.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.18

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.25

0.92

+5.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.22

1.71

+17.51

TSMU vs. WTIU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMU Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the WTIU Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMU and WTIU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSMUWTIUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

0.58

+2.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

-0.05

+0.96

Correlation

The correlation between TSMU and WTIU is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TSMU vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison

Neither TSMU nor WTIU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TSMU vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMU drawdown since its inception was -63.73%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMU and WTIU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TSMUWTIUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.73%

-75.73%

+12.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.18%

-53.11%

+17.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.57%

-24.42%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.00%

-39.49%

+22.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.44%

28.53%

-17.09%

Volatility

TSMU vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) has a higher volatility of 27.92% compared to MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) at 22.50%. This indicates that TSMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TSMUWTIUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.92%

22.50%

+5.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.47%

46.56%

+7.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.26%

81.69%

-4.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.81%

69.54%

+11.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.81%

69.54%

+11.27%