PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSMU vs. TSYY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSMU vs. TSYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSMU achieves a 82.73% return, which is significantly higher than TSYY's -16.60% return.


TSMU

1D
-3.86%
1M
16.16%
YTD
82.73%
6M
90.80%
1Y
276.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSYY

1D
0.17%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
-16.60%
6M
-16.47%
1Y
-12.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSMU vs. TSYY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSMU
GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF
82.73%74.83%1.13%
TSYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF
-16.60%-15.96%-0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between TSMU and TSYY is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSMU vs. TSYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSMU
TSMU Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TSMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMU Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMU Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

TSYY
TSYY Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TSYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSYY Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TSYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSYY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSMU vs. TSYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSMUTSYYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.91

-0.39

+4.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.66

-0.33

+3.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

0.96

+0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.91

-0.45

+8.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

25.63

-0.85

+26.48

TSMU vs. TSYY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSMU Sharpe Ratio is 3.91, which is higher than the TSYY Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSMU and TSYY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSMUTSYYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.91

-0.39

+4.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

-0.59

+2.04

Drawdowns

TSMU vs. TSYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSMU drawdown since its inception was -63.73%, which is greater than TSYY's maximum drawdown of -41.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMU and TSYY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSMUTSYYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.73%

-41.52%

-22.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.18%

-27.31%

-7.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.86%

-36.69%

+32.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.00%

-25.88%

+9.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.83%

14.49%

-3.66%

Volatility

TSMU vs. TSYY - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) has a higher volatility of 22.60% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) at 4.86%. This indicates that TSMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSMUTSYYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.60%

4.86%

+17.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.16%

19.69%

+34.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.26%

31.77%

+39.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.45%

37.52%

+42.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.45%

37.52%

+42.93%

TSMU vs. TSYY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSMU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSYY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSMU vs. TSYY - Dividend Comparison

TSMU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 282.79%.


PositionTTM20252024
TSMU
GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF
282.79%256.64%0.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSMU and TSYY have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMU has higher volatility (22.60%) compared to TSYY (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSMU dropped -63.73% vs TSYY's -41.52%.

On 1-year performance, TSMU leads with 276.19% vs -12.29% for TSYY. On fees, TSYY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSYY has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMU has performed better with a 276.19% return vs -12.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSYY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSMU.

TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 282.79%, compared with 0.00% for TSMU.

TSMU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSYY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSMU and 0.99% for TSYY.

TSMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSMU and TSYY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer