TSMU vs. BRKL
TSMU (GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF) and BRKL (Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.32 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TSMU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BRKL.
Performance
TSMU vs. BRKL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TSMU
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -15.84%
- 6M
- 25.27%
- YTD
- 45.22%
- 1Y
- 118.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 75.77%
BRKL
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $853.16 | $14.75K | $14.75K | |
| $5.79M | $7.14M | $6.95M |
TSMU vs. BRKL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TSMU GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF | -22.18% |
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSMU and BRKL is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | -0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSMU vs. BRKL — Risk / Return Rank
TSMU
BRKL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSMU vs. BRKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMU) and Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSMU | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.05 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSMU vs. BRKL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSMU drawdown since its inception was -63.73%, which is greater than BRKL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSMU and BRKL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSMU | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.73% | -7.03% | -56.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.97% | -0.13% | -30.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.13% | -4.14% | -11.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.35% | — | — |
Volatility
TSMU vs. BRKL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSMU | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.06% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.66% | 30.99% | +50.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 84.08% | 30.99% | +53.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 84.08% | 30.99% | +53.09% |
TSMU vs. BRKL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSMU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSMU vs. BRKL - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSMU nor BRKL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TSMU and BRKL have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSMU.
TSMU and BRKL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Corgi. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSMU and 0.45% for BRKL.
Find the right allocation for TSMU and BRKL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer