PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSME vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSME vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSME achieves a 17.97% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 32.35% return.


TSME

1D
-1.58%
1M
-1.15%
6M
11.83%
YTD
17.97%
1Y
28.36%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
10Y*

GSG

1D
3.60%
1M
-0.20%
6M
28.24%
YTD
32.35%
1Y
34.57%
3Y*
14.41%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
7.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSME vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TSME
Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF
17.97%13.79%18.98%17.82%2.90%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
32.35%5.93%8.52%-5.51%-2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between TSME and GSG is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2022

0.09

The correlation between TSME and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSME vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSME
TSME Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
TSME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSME Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSME Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TSME Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSME Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSME vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSMEGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.27

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.85

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.49

6.29

+0.19

TSME vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSME Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSME and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSME vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSME drawdown since its inception was -26.59%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSME and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSMEGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.59%

-89.62%

+63.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.72%

-18.81%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.59%

-18.81%

-7.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.21%

-60.04%

+53.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-63.69%

+58.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

5.51%

-1.13%

Volatility

TSME vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF (TSME) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) at 7.35%. This indicates that TSME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSMEGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.88%

7.35%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.50%

21.50%

-3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.41%

23.48%

-1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.85%

22.80%

-0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.85%

22.00%

-0.15%

TSME vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSME vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

TSME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSME
Thrivent Small-Mid Cap ESG ETF
0.14%0.17%0.38%0.53%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSME and GSG have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSME has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to GSG (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSME dropped -26.59% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 3-year performance, TSME leads with 18.65% vs 14.41% for GSG. On fees, TSME is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, GSG has been the lower-risk option at 7.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TSME has performed better with a 18.65% return vs 14.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSME is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.

TSME has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

TSME is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Thrivent and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TSME and 0.75% for GSG.

GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSME and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer