TSLZ vs. SARK
TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) and SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLZ returned -51.89% vs -19.94% for SARK. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLZ charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SARK.
Performance
TSLZ vs. SARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLZ achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly higher than SARK's -6.20% return.
TSLZ
- 1D
- 11.56%
- 1M
- 18.35%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- 1Y
- -51.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SARK
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- -6.20%
- 6M
- -1.73%
- 1Y
- -19.94%
- 3Y*
- -30.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLZ vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 11.42% | -75.98% | -88.79% | -24.75% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -6.20% | -25.93% | -36.90% | -30.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLZ and SARK is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023 | 0.65 |
The correlation between TSLZ and SARK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLZ vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank
TSLZ
SARK
TSLZ vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLZ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | -0.75 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | -1.26 | +0.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLZ vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, which is greater than SARK's maximum drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLZ and SARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLZ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.11% | -81.07% | -18.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.88% | -26.61% | -46.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -74.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.83% | -79.29% | -19.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.70% | -46.79% | -28.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 57.22% | 15.99% | +41.23% |
Volatility
TSLZ vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) has a higher volatility of 27.70% compared to Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) at 12.56%. This indicates that TSLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLZ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.70% | 12.56% | +15.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.77% | 26.66% | +30.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.07% | 35.83% | +52.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 116.88% | 56.15% | +60.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 116.88% | 56.15% | +60.73% |
TSLZ vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLZ vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison
TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than SARK's 3.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.00% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.62% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLZ and SARK have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLZ has higher volatility (27.70%) compared to SARK (12.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLZ dropped -99.11% vs SARK's -81.07%.
On 1-year performance, SARK leads with -19.94% vs -51.89% for TSLZ. On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SARK has been the lower-risk option at 12.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SARK has performed better with a -19.94% return vs -51.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLZ.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 0.62% for TSLZ.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and AXS. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLZ and 0.75% for SARK.
SARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.56 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLZ and SARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer