TSLZ vs. MSTU
TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) and MSTU (T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while MSTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLZ returned -64.61% vs -94.18% for MSTU. At a correlation of -0.42, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.05% expense ratio.
Performance
TSLZ vs. MSTU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLZ achieves a -5.60% return, which is significantly higher than MSTU's -46.81% return.
TSLZ
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- -18.37%
- YTD
- -5.60%
- 6M
- -16.90%
- 1Y
- -64.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTU
- 1D
- -18.30%
- 1M
- -44.61%
- YTD
- -46.81%
- 6M
- -64.64%
- 1Y
- -94.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLZ vs. MSTU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | -5.60% | -75.98% | -81.82% |
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF | -46.81% | -89.07% | 197.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLZ and MSTU is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2024 | -0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLZ vs. MSTU — Risk / Return Rank
TSLZ
MSTU
TSLZ vs. MSTU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLZ | MSTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | -0.68 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | -1.92 | +0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.80 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.97 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | -1.26 | +0.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLZ | MSTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 | -0.68 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.38 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
TSLZ vs. MSTU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTU drawdown of -98.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLZ and MSTU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLZ | MSTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.11% | -98.58% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.62% | -96.58% | +19.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.01% | -98.28% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.32% | -71.88% | -3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.42% | 74.92% | -14.50% |
Volatility
TSLZ vs. MSTU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) is 24.08%, while T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) has a volatility of 38.67%. This indicates that TSLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLZ | MSTU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.08% | 38.67% | -14.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.94% | 111.13% | -56.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.67% | 138.01% | -46.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.13% | 168.91% | -51.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.13% | 168.91% | -51.78% |
TSLZ vs. MSTU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TSLZ and MSTU have an expense ratio of 1.05%.
Dividends
TSLZ vs. MSTU - Dividend Comparison
TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, while MSTU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.73% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLZ and MSTU have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTU has higher volatility (38.67%) compared to TSLZ (24.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLZ dropped -99.11% vs MSTU's -98.58%.
On 1-year performance, TSLZ leads with -64.61% vs -94.18% for MSTU. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, TSLZ has been the lower-risk option at 24.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLZ has performed better with a -64.61% return vs -94.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLZ and MSTU have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.
TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for MSTU.
TSLZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while MSTU is Leveraged Equities.
MSTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.68 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLZ and MSTU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer