TSLZ vs. HIBS
TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) and HIBS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds. TSLZ is actively managed, while HIBS is passively managed. Over the past year, TSLZ returned -64.61% vs -83.87% for HIBS. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLZ charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for HIBS.
Performance
TSLZ vs. HIBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLZ achieves a -5.60% return, which is significantly higher than HIBS's -60.48% return.
TSLZ
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- -18.37%
- YTD
- -5.60%
- 6M
- -16.90%
- 1Y
- -64.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HIBS
- 1D
- -5.60%
- 1M
- -32.77%
- YTD
- -60.48%
- 6M
- -63.58%
- 1Y
- -83.87%
- 3Y*
- -63.29%
- 5Y*
- -53.79%
- 10Y*
- —
TSLZ vs. HIBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | -5.60% | -75.98% | -88.79% | -28.07% |
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares | -60.48% | -72.44% | -26.60% | -47.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLZ and HIBS is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.54 |
The correlation between TSLZ and HIBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLZ vs. HIBS — Risk / Return Rank
TSLZ
HIBS
TSLZ vs. HIBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLZ | HIBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | -1.24 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | -3.08 | +2.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 0.68 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -1.01 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | -1.51 | +0.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLZ | HIBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 | -1.24 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.73 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
TSLZ vs. HIBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLZ drawdown since its inception was -99.11%, roughly equal to the maximum HIBS drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLZ and HIBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLZ | HIBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.11% | -99.98% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.62% | -83.13% | +6.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -96.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -98.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.01% | -99.98% | +0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.32% | -93.13% | +17.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.42% | 55.90% | +4.52% |
Volatility
TSLZ vs. HIBS - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) has a higher volatility of 24.08% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) at 21.89%. This indicates that TSLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLZ | HIBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.08% | 21.89% | +2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.94% | 52.77% | +2.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.67% | 67.61% | +24.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.13% | 82.47% | +34.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.13% | 94.83% | +22.30% |
TSLZ vs. HIBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLZ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than HIBS's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLZ vs. HIBS - Dividend Comparison
TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than HIBS's 11.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares | 11.98% | 8.42% | 5.34% | 6.49% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 0.13% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.73% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLZ and HIBS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLZ has higher volatility (24.08%) compared to HIBS (21.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLZ dropped -99.11% vs HIBS's -99.98%.
On 1-year performance, TSLZ leads with -64.61% vs -83.87% for HIBS. On fees, TSLZ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, HIBS has been the lower-risk option at 21.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLZ has performed better with a -64.61% return vs -83.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLZ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for HIBS.
HIBS has the higher dividend yield at 11.98%, compared with 0.73% for TSLZ.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLZ and 1.06% for HIBS.
TSLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.71 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLZ and HIBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer