TSLY vs. CRSH
TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while CRSH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLY returned 27.37% vs -18.98% for CRSH. At a correlation of -0.94, they often move in opposite directions. TSLY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CRSH.
Performance
TSLY vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLY achieves a -2.70% return, which is significantly lower than CRSH's 3.70% return.
TSLY
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- -2.70%
- 6M
- -3.20%
- 1Y
- 27.37%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRSH
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -8.50%
- YTD
- 3.70%
- 6M
- 5.11%
- 1Y
- -18.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLY vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | -2.70% | 13.62% | 59.77% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 3.70% | -13.40% | -51.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLY and CRSH is -0.97, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2024 | -0.94 |
The correlation between TSLY and CRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.97 to -0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLY vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank
TSLY
CRSH
TSLY vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLY | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.94 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | -0.57 | +1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | -0.90 | +4.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLY | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | -0.52 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | -0.70 | +1.00 |
Drawdowns
TSLY vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLY drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, smaller than the maximum CRSH drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLY and CRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLY | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.52% | -63.68% | +14.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.64% | -33.45% | +11.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.03% | -59.20% | +50.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.99% | -43.15% | +23.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.95% | 21.20% | -12.25% |
Volatility
TSLY vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) have volatilities of 10.02% and 10.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLY | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.02% | 10.19% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.40% | 22.67% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.20% | 36.71% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.48% | 47.46% | -1.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.48% | 47.46% | -1.98% |
TSLY vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLY vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison
TSLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 86.88%, less than CRSH's 97.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 97.46% | 138.78% | 94.25% | 0.00% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 86.88% | 91.19% | 82.30% | 76.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLY and CRSH have a correlation of -0.97, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRSH has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to TSLY (10.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLY dropped -49.52% vs CRSH's -63.68%.
On 1-year performance, TSLY leads with 27.37% vs -18.98% for CRSH. On fees, CRSH is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSLY has been the lower-risk option at 10.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLY has performed better with a 27.37% return vs -18.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRSH is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLY.
CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 97.46%, compared with 86.88% for TSLY.
TSLY is categorized as Options Trading, while CRSH is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLY and 0.99% for CRSH.
TSLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLY and CRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer