TSLY vs. CRSH
TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLY is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while CRSH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLY returned 8.88% vs -7.97% for CRSH. Their -0.94 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TSLY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CRSH.
Performance
TSLY vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLY achieves a -21.41% return, which is significantly lower than CRSH's 21.72% return.
TSLY
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- -15.27%
- 6M
- -19.06%
- YTD
- -21.41%
- 1Y
- 8.88%
- 3Y*
- 1.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.32%
CRSH
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 13.05%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- YTD
- 21.72%
- 1Y
- -7.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -26.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $457.04K | $338.01K | $365.84K | |
| $11.38M | $11.26M | $16.77M |
TSLY vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | -21.41% | 13.62% | 60.27% |
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 21.72% | -13.40% | -52.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLY and CRSH is -0.97, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2024 | -0.94 |
The correlation between TSLY and CRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.97 to -0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLY vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank
TSLY
CRSH
TSLY vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLY | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.99 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | -0.26 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.80 | -0.41 | +1.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLY vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLY drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, smaller than the maximum CRSH drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLY and CRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLY | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.52% | -63.68% | +14.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.78% | -30.50% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.51% | -52.11% | +25.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.80% | -44.01% | +24.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.07% | 19.37% | -8.30% |
Volatility
TSLY vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) has a higher volatility of 17.02% compared to YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) at 12.40%. This indicates that TSLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLY | CRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.02% | 12.40% | +4.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.63% | 26.58% | +3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.27% | 36.86% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.97% | 47.45% | -1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.97% | 47.45% | -1.48% |
TSLY vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLY vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison
TSLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 107.97%, more than CRSH's 78.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 78.07% | 138.78% | 94.25% | 0.00% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 107.97% | 91.19% | 82.30% | 76.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLY and CRSH have a correlation of -0.97, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLY has higher volatility (17.02%) compared to CRSH (12.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLY dropped -49.52% vs CRSH's -63.68%.
On 1-year performance, TSLY leads with 8.88% vs -7.97% for CRSH. On fees, CRSH is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, CRSH has been the lower-risk option at 12.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLY has performed better with a 8.88% return vs -7.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRSH is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TSLY.
TSLY has the higher dividend yield at 107.97%, compared with 78.07% for CRSH.
TSLY is categorized as Options Trading, while CRSH is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLY and 0.99% for CRSH.
TSLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLY and CRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer