TSLW vs. LFGY

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

TSLW (Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF) and LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLW returned 7.72% vs -9.94% for LFGY. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for LFGY.

Performance

TSLW vs. LFGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLW achieves a -23.54% return, which is significantly lower than LFGY's 8.72% return.

TSLW

• 1D: -3.56%
• 1M: -9.65%
• 6M: -20.90%
• YTD: -23.54%
• 1Y: 7.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.04%

LFGY

• 1D: 3.97%
• 1M: -9.03%
• 6M: -2.03%
• YTD: 8.72%
• 1Y: -9.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -0.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLW vs. LFGY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF	-23.54%	35.28%
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	8.72%	-3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLW and LFGY is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

TSLW vs. LFGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLW

TSLW Risk / Return Rank: 14
TSLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
TSLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
TSLW Omega Ratio Rank: 15
TSLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
TSLW Martin Ratio Rank: 13

LFGY

LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 8
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 8
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLW vs. LFGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSLW	LFGY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	-0.25	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	-0.09	+0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	0.99	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.22	-0.28	+0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.45	-0.58	+1.03

TSLW vs. LFGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLW Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is higher than the LFGY Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLW and LFGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSLW vs. LFGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLW drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, roughly equal to the maximum LFGY drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLW and LFGY.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLW	LFGY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.80%	-35.94%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.80%	-35.94%	+0.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.09%	-16.95%	-14.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.09%	-14.06%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.35%	17.19%	+0.16%

Volatility

TSLW vs. LFGY - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) has a higher volatility of 20.20% compared to YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) at 11.39%. This indicates that TSLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LFGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLW	LFGY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.20%	11.39%	+8.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.55%	32.38%	+5.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.50%	39.55%	+13.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.94%	42.27%	+14.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.94%	42.27%	+14.67%

TSLW vs. LFGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than LFGY's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLW vs. LFGY - Dividend Comparison

TSLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 101.07%, more than LFGY's 85.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	85.09%	94.90%
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF	101.07%	49.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLW and LFGY in my portfolio?

TSLW and LFGY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLW or LFGY?

TSLW has higher volatility (20.20%) compared to LFGY (11.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLW dropped -35.80% vs LFGY's -35.94%.

Which ETF is better, TSLW or LFGY?

On 1-year performance, TSLW leads with 7.72% vs -9.94% for LFGY. On fees, TSLW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, LFGY has been the lower-risk option at 11.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLW or LFGY?

Over the 1-year period, TSLW has performed better with a 7.72% return vs -9.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLW or LFGY?

TSLW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for LFGY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLW or LFGY?

TSLW has the higher dividend yield at 101.07%, compared with 85.09% for LFGY.

What is the main difference between TSLW and LFGY?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSLW and 1.02% for LFGY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.