TSLW vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TSLW (Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. TSLW is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past year, TSLW returned 20.22% vs 91.89% for BNO. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. TSLW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

TSLW vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLW achieves a -9.26% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.

TSLW

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 9.09%
• YTD: -9.26%
• 6M: -9.14%
• 1Y: 20.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -10.29%
• YTD: 90.47%
• 6M: 86.00%
• 1Y: 91.89%
• 3Y*: 27.93%
• 5Y*: 24.16%
• 10Y*: 13.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLW vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF	-9.26%	33.77%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	90.47%	1.47%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLW and BNO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025	-0.14

Return for Risk

TSLW vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLW

TSLW Risk / Return Rank: 15
TSLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
TSLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
TSLW Omega Ratio Rank: 17
TSLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
TSLW Martin Ratio Rank: 15

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLW vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSLW	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	2.23	-1.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.87	2.73	-1.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.38	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.57	5.17	-4.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.29	9.76	-8.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSLW vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLW Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLW and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSLW	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37	2.23	-1.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.14	+0.25

Drawdowns

TSLW vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLW drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLW and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLW	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.80%	-87.06%	+51.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.80%	-17.87%	-17.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.23%	-10.29%	-7.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.88%	-40.17%	+27.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.77%	9.45%	+6.32%

Volatility

TSLW vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) have volatilities of 14.56% and 14.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLW	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.56%	14.22%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.83%	36.10%	-3.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.52%	41.46%	+14.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.52%	35.38%	+20.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.52%	36.68%	+18.84%

TSLW vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLW vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

TSLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 84.61%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF	84.61%	49.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLW and BNO in my portfolio?

TSLW and BNO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLW or BNO?

TSLW has higher volatility (14.56%) compared to BNO (14.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLW dropped -35.80% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, TSLW or BNO?

On 1-year performance, BNO leads with 91.89% vs 20.22% for TSLW. On fees, BNO is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, BNO has been the lower-risk option at 14.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLW or BNO?

Over the 1-year period, BNO has performed better with a 91.89% return vs 20.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLW or BNO?

BNO is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSLW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLW or BNO?

TSLW has the higher dividend yield at 84.61%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between TSLW and BNO?

TSLW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSLW and 0.90% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.