PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLS vs. SOXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLS vs. SOXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLS achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly higher than SOXS's -91.68% return.


TSLS

1D
-1.93%
1M
-8.56%
YTD
3.03%
6M
-2.42%
1Y
-29.14%
3Y*
-38.35%
5Y*
10Y*

SOXS

1D
-17.41%
1M
-60.17%
YTD
-91.68%
6M
-91.80%
1Y
-97.83%
3Y*
-86.41%
5Y*
-79.75%
10Y*
-78.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLS vs. SOXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TSLS
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares
3.03%-34.95%-55.71%-60.12%100.52%
SOXS
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares
-91.68%-85.53%-59.55%-84.56%-6.94%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLS and SOXS is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLS vs. SOXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLS
TSLS Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
TSLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLS Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLS Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXS
SOXS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SOXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLS vs. SOXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLSSOXSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.63

-0.96

+0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.72

-3.97

+3.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.58

+0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

-1.00

+0.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.87

-1.39

+0.52

TSLS vs. SOXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLS Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is higher than the SOXS Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLS and SOXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLSSOXSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

-0.96

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.54

-0.79

+0.25

Drawdowns

TSLS vs. SOXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLS drawdown since its inception was -90.73%, smaller than the maximum SOXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLS and SOXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLSSOXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.73%

-100.00%

+9.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.42%

-97.64%

+51.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.16%

-99.79%

+15.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.61%

-100.00%

+10.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.47%

-92.60%

+29.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.75%

70.48%

-37.73%

Volatility

TSLS vs. SOXS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares (TSLS) is 12.05%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) has a volatility of 44.74%. This indicates that TSLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLSSOXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.05%

44.74%

-32.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.72%

83.91%

-56.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.68%

102.16%

-55.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.79%

108.22%

-49.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.79%

100.49%

-41.70%

TSLS vs. SOXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLS has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXS's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLS vs. SOXS - Dividend Comparison

TSLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than SOXS's 64.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SOXS
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares
64.90%10.79%5.45%9.22%0.19%0.00%3.58%2.30%0.76%
TSLS
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares
3.39%4.30%7.62%4.52%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLS and SOXS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXS has higher volatility (44.74%) compared to TSLS (12.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLS dropped -90.73% vs SOXS's -100.00%.

On 3-year performance, TSLS leads with -38.35% vs -86.41% for SOXS. On fees, TSLS is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, TSLS has been the lower-risk option at 12.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TSLS has performed better with a -38.35% return vs -86.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLS is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SOXS.

SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 64.90%, compared with 3.39% for TSLS.

TSLS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SOXS is Leveraged Equities. TSLS tracks Tesla Inc (--100%), while SOXS tracks PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TSLS and 1.08% for SOXS.

TSLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLS and SOXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer