PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLR vs. TSLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TSLR vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TSLR vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSLR
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF
-32.17%-25.97%-16.81%
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
-32.40%-26.70%-16.81%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TSLR having a -32.17% return and TSLG slightly lower at -32.40%.


TSLR

1D
5.08%
1M
-12.45%
YTD
-32.17%
6M
-40.15%
1Y
33.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLG

1D
5.35%
1M
-12.62%
YTD
-32.40%
6M
-40.60%
1Y
32.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TSLR vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLR has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TSLR vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLR
TSLR Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLR vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLRTSLGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.31

0.30

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.25

1.23

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.15

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

0.83

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.82

1.76

+0.07

TSLR vs. TSLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is comparable to the TSLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLR and TSLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLRTSLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

0.30

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

-0.42

+0.37

Correlation

The correlation between TSLR and TSLG is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TSLR vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison

TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.69%.


Drawdowns

TSLR vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLR drawdown since its inception was -82.80%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLG drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLR and TSLG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLRTSLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.80%

-82.86%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.66%

-50.92%

+0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.29%

-65.85%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.40%

-58.06%

+8.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.92%

23.98%

-0.06%

Volatility

TSLR vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) have volatilities of 22.71% and 22.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TSLRTSLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.71%

22.51%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.99%

59.61%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

110.92%

110.65%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

117.38%

118.91%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

117.38%

118.91%

-1.53%