TSLR vs. RDW
TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while RDW (Redwire Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, TSLR returned 19.41% vs -21.74% for RDW. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TSLR vs. RDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLR achieves a -27.58% return, which is significantly lower than RDW's 98.95% return.
TSLR
- 1D
- 3.62%
- 1M
- -19.09%
- YTD
- -27.58%
- 6M
- -31.37%
- 1Y
- 19.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RDW
- 1D
- -11.53%
- 1M
- 31.94%
- YTD
- 98.95%
- 6M
- 107.41%
- 1Y
- -21.74%
- 3Y*
- 79.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLR vs. RDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | -27.58% | -25.97% | 67.57% | 1.69% |
RDW Redwire Corporation | 98.95% | -53.83% | 477.54% | -12.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLR and RDW is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLR vs. RDW — Risk / Return Rank
TSLR
RDW
TSLR vs. RDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and Redwire Corporation (RDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLR | RDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.07 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | -0.29 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.73 | -0.42 | +1.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLR vs. RDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLR drawdown since its inception was -82.80%, smaller than the maximum RDW drawdown of -87.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLR and RDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLR | RDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.80% | -87.26% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.37% | -75.40% | +21.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -80.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.94% | -41.62% | -21.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.31% | -59.30% | +8.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.72% | 51.88% | -25.16% |
Volatility
TSLR vs. RDW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) is 28.92%, while Redwire Corporation (RDW) has a volatility of 53.68%. This indicates that TSLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLR | RDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.92% | 53.68% | -24.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.66% | 94.49% | -36.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.10% | 118.63% | -29.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 115.61% | 96.83% | +18.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.61% | 96.83% | +18.78% |
Dividends
TSLR vs. RDW - Dividend Comparison
Neither TSLR nor RDW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLR and RDW have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDW has higher volatility (53.68%) compared to TSLR (28.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLR dropped -82.80% vs RDW's -87.26%.
TSLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLR and RDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer