PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLR vs. NVYY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLR vs. NVYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLR achieves a -58.03% return, which is significantly lower than NVYY's 2.07% return.


TSLR

1D
7.01%
1M
-36.27%
6M
-51.23%
YTD
-58.03%
1Y
-18.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-19.39%

NVYY

1D
0.27%
1M
0.93%
6M
-0.36%
YTD
2.07%
1Y
5.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
27.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$402.28K$501.71K$1.05M
$20.74M$20.82M$40.66M

TSLR vs. NVYY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TSLR
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF
-58.03%56.35%
NVYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF
2.07%31.98%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLR and NVYY is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2025

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLR vs. NVYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TSLR
TSLR Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
TSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

NVYY
NVYY Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
NVYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVYY Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
NVYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVYY Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TSLR vs. NVYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLRNVYYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.06

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

0.38

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.59

0.79

-1.39

TSLR vs. NVYY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLR Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the NVYY Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLR and NVYY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLR vs. NVYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLR drawdown since its inception was -82.80%, which is greater than NVYY's maximum drawdown of -14.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLR and NVYY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLRNVYYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.80%

-14.90%

-67.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.80%

-14.90%

-54.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.52%

-7.16%

-71.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.16%

-5.25%

-45.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.54%

7.09%

+24.45%

Volatility

TSLR vs. NVYY - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) has a higher volatility of 41.95% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) at 3.85%. This indicates that TSLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLRNVYYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.95%

3.85%

+38.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.80%

14.68%

+56.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

93.05%

23.69%

+69.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

116.22%

22.97%

+93.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

116.22%

22.97%

+93.25%

TSLR vs. NVYY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than NVYY's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLR vs. NVYY - Dividend Comparison

TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 132.70%.


PositionTTM2025
NVYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF
132.70%75.30%
TSLR
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLR and NVYY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLR has higher volatility (41.95%) compared to NVYY (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLR dropped -82.80% vs NVYY's -14.90%.

On 1-year performance, NVYY leads with 5.62% vs -18.69% for TSLR. On fees, TSLR is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NVYY has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVYY has performed better with a 5.62% return vs -18.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLR is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for NVYY.

NVYY has the higher dividend yield at 132.70%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.

Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TSLR and 1.15% for NVYY.

NVYY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLR and NVYY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer