TSLR vs. DFEN
TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) and DFEN (Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TSLR is actively managed, while DFEN is passively managed. Over the past year, TSLR returned 19.41% vs 76.99% for DFEN. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLR charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for DFEN.
Performance
TSLR vs. DFEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLR achieves a -27.58% return, which is significantly lower than DFEN's 13.12% return.
TSLR
- 1D
- 3.62%
- 1M
- -19.09%
- YTD
- -27.58%
- 6M
- -31.37%
- 1Y
- 19.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFEN
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- 7.74%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 6M
- 20.44%
- 1Y
- 76.99%
- 3Y*
- 64.38%
- 5Y*
- 29.22%
- 10Y*
- —
TSLR vs. DFEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | -27.58% | -25.97% | 67.57% | 1.69% |
DFEN Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares | 13.12% | 156.62% | 27.07% | 27.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLR and DFEN is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023 | 0.32 |
TSLR vs. DFEN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TSLR
DFEN
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
TSLR
DFEN
-
Basic Materials
TSLR
-
DFEN
-
Communication Services
TSLR
-
DFEN
-
Consumer Defensive
TSLR
-
DFEN
-
Energy
TSLR
-
DFEN
-
Financial Services
TSLR
-
DFEN
-
Healthcare
TSLR
-
DFEN
-
Industrials
TSLR
-
DFEN
Real Estate
TSLR
-
DFEN
-
Technology
TSLR
-
DFEN
Utilities
TSLR
-
DFEN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLR vs. DFEN — Risk / Return Rank
TSLR
DFEN
TSLR vs. DFEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) and Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares (DFEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLR | DFEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.22 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 1.85 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.73 | 4.29 | -3.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLR vs. DFEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLR drawdown since its inception was -82.80%, smaller than the maximum DFEN drawdown of -91.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLR and DFEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLR | DFEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.80% | -91.36% | +8.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.37% | -41.75% | -12.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -43.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.94% | -25.87% | -37.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.31% | -45.20% | -5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.72% | 17.99% | +8.73% |
Volatility
TSLR vs. DFEN - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) has a higher volatility of 28.92% compared to Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares (DFEN) at 27.31%. This indicates that TSLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLR | DFEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.92% | 27.31% | +1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.66% | 55.81% | +1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.10% | 65.81% | +23.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 115.61% | 60.74% | +54.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.61% | 71.66% | +43.95% |
TSLR vs. DFEN - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLR has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DFEN's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLR vs. DFEN - Dividend Comparison
TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DFEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEN Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares | 7.89% | 8.89% | 14.12% | 1.13% | 0.46% | 1.89% | 0.48% | 0.50% | 1.07% | 1.50% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLR and DFEN have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLR has higher volatility (28.92%) compared to DFEN (27.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLR dropped -82.80% vs DFEN's -91.36%.
On 1-year performance, DFEN leads with 76.99% vs 19.41% for TSLR. On fees, DFEN is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, DFEN has been the lower-risk option at 27.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DFEN has performed better with a 76.99% return vs 19.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFEN is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.
DFEN has the higher dividend yield at 7.89%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSLR and 0.99% for DFEN.
DFEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLR and DFEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer