PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLQ vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLQ vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLQ achieves a -3.80% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -55.68% return.


TSLQ

1D
-3.75%
1M
-18.02%
YTD
-3.80%
6M
-15.12%
1Y
-62.78%
3Y*
-68.13%
5Y*
10Y*

SMST

1D
17.75%
1M
49.84%
YTD
-55.68%
6M
-41.65%
1Y
40.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLQ vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSLQ
AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF
-3.80%-74.67%-82.93%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
-55.68%-44.36%-90.90%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLQ and SMST is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLQ vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLQ
TSLQ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TSLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLQ vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLQSMSTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.68

0.29

-0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.86

1.40

-2.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.18

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

0.44

-1.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.04

0.93

-1.97

TSLQ vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLQ and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLQSMSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.68

0.29

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.65

-0.53

-0.12

Drawdowns

TSLQ vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLQ drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, roughly equal to the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLQ and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLQSMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.73%

-99.25%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.93%

-85.39%

+9.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.57%

-98.26%

-0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.15%

-90.65%

+23.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

59.46%

40.51%

+18.95%

Volatility

TSLQ vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) is 24.08%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 37.28%. This indicates that TSLQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLQSMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.08%

37.28%

-13.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.84%

125.90%

-71.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.72%

140.31%

-47.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.16%

166.64%

-72.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

94.16%

166.64%

-72.48%

TSLQ vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLQ has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLQ vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.98%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSLQ
AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF
10.98%10.56%4.95%13.35%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLQ and SMST have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMST has higher volatility (37.28%) compared to TSLQ (24.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLQ dropped -98.73% vs SMST's -99.25%.

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 40.09% vs -62.78% for TSLQ. On fees, TSLQ is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, TSLQ has been the lower-risk option at 24.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 40.09% return vs -62.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLQ is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.98%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

They also come from different issuers: AXS and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSLQ and 1.29% for SMST.

SMST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLQ and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer