TSLQ vs. QYLG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

TSLQ (Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF) and QYLG (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while QYLG is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. TSLQ is actively managed, while QYLG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSLQ returned -65.39%/yr vs 21.20%/yr for QYLG. At a correlation of -0.57, they often move in opposite directions. TSLQ charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLG.

Performance

TSLQ vs. QYLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLQ achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than QYLG's 15.37% return.

TSLQ

• 1D: -2.22%
• 1M: 6.08%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 6M: 19.91%
• 1Y: -62.10%
• 3Y*: -65.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLG

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 3.15%
• YTD: 15.37%
• 6M: 14.82%
• 1Y: 33.40%
• 3Y*: 21.20%
• 5Y*: 12.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLQ vs. QYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF	1.82%	-74.67%	-83.21%	-59.97%	61.04%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	15.37%	15.29%	22.02%	38.73%	-5.87%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLQ and QYLG is -0.59, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022	-0.57

The correlation between TSLQ and QYLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.59 to -0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TSLQ vs. QYLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLQ

TSLQ Risk / Return Rank: 3
TSLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
TSLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
TSLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4
TSLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
TSLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

QYLG

QYLG Risk / Return Rank: 82
QYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
QYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
QYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 81
QYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
QYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLQ vs. QYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSLQ	QYLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.70	2.51	-3.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.89	3.37	-4.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.46	-0.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	3.99	-4.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.11	17.50	-18.61

TSLQ vs. QYLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the QYLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLQ and QYLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSLQ vs. QYLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLQ drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, which is greater than QYLG's maximum drawdown of -29.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLQ and QYLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLQ	QYLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.73%	-29.98%	-68.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.21%	-8.42%	-63.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-97.85%	-20.75%	-77.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.48%	-0.35%	-98.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.58%	-6.38%	-61.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	56.11%	1.91%	+54.20%

Volatility

TSLQ vs. QYLG - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a higher volatility of 25.56% compared to Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) at 6.10%. This indicates that TSLQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLQ	QYLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.56%	6.10%	+19.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.10%	11.19%	+44.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	88.72%	13.42%	+75.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	94.17%	18.15%	+76.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	94.17%	18.02%	+76.15%

TSLQ vs. QYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLQ has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLG's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLQ vs. QYLG - Dividend Comparison

TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.38%, less than QYLG's 16.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	16.78%	17.93%	25.27%	5.43%	6.91%	10.15%	1.44%
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF	10.38%	10.56%	4.95%	13.35%	2.56%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLQ and QYLG in my portfolio?

TSLQ and QYLG have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLQ or QYLG?

TSLQ has higher volatility (25.56%) compared to QYLG (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLQ dropped -98.73% vs QYLG's -29.98%.

Which ETF is better, TSLQ or QYLG?

On 3-year performance, QYLG leads with 21.20% vs -65.39% for TSLQ. On fees, QYLG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLG has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLQ or QYLG?

Over the 3-year period, QYLG has performed better with a 21.20% return vs -65.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLQ or QYLG?

QYLG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for TSLQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLQ or QYLG?

QYLG has the higher dividend yield at 16.78%, compared with 10.38% for TSLQ.

What is the main difference between TSLQ and QYLG?

TSLQ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QYLG is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for TSLQ and 0.60% for QYLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.