PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLQ vs. NFXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLQ vs. NFXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLQ achieves a -3.80% return, which is significantly lower than NFXS's 8.89% return.


TSLQ

1D
-3.75%
1M
-18.02%
YTD
-3.80%
6M
-15.12%
1Y
-62.78%
3Y*
-68.13%
5Y*
10Y*

NFXS

1D
2.94%
1M
10.36%
YTD
8.89%
6M
26.62%
1Y
40.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLQ vs. NFXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSLQ
AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF
-3.80%-74.67%-78.32%
NFXS
Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares
8.89%-8.56%-21.19%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLQ and NFXS is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024

0.23

Over the past year, the correlation between TSLQ and NFXS has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.23, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLQ vs. NFXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLQ
TSLQ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TSLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

NFXS
NFXS Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NFXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFXS Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
NFXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFXS Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLQ vs. NFXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLQNFXSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.68

1.22

-1.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.86

1.80

-2.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.25

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

1.25

-2.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.04

3.44

-4.49

TSLQ vs. NFXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the NFXS Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLQ and NFXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLQNFXSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.68

1.22

-1.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.65

-0.40

-0.25

Drawdowns

TSLQ vs. NFXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLQ drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, which is greater than NFXS's maximum drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLQ and NFXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLQNFXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.73%

-50.37%

-48.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.93%

-31.31%

-44.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.57%

-23.62%

-74.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.15%

-32.41%

-34.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

59.46%

11.37%

+48.09%

Volatility

TSLQ vs. NFXS - Volatility Comparison

AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a higher volatility of 24.08% compared to Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) at 7.06%. This indicates that TSLQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLQNFXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.08%

7.06%

+17.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.84%

26.35%

+28.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.72%

33.08%

+59.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.16%

34.68%

+59.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

94.16%

34.68%

+59.48%

TSLQ vs. NFXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLQ has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NFXS's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLQ vs. NFXS - Dividend Comparison

TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.98%, more than NFXS's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
NFXS
Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares
2.87%3.53%0.87%0.00%0.00%
TSLQ
AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF
10.98%10.56%4.95%13.35%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLQ and NFXS have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLQ has higher volatility (24.08%) compared to NFXS (7.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLQ dropped -98.73% vs NFXS's -50.37%.

On 1-year performance, NFXS leads with 40.25% vs -62.78% for TSLQ. On fees, NFXS is cheaper at 1.03% per year. On volatility, NFXS has been the lower-risk option at 7.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NFXS has performed better with a 40.25% return vs -62.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NFXS is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSLQ.

TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.98%, compared with 2.87% for NFXS.

They also come from different issuers: AXS and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSLQ and 1.03% for NFXS.

NFXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLQ and NFXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer