TSLQ vs. CARD
TSLQ (Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF) and CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds. TSLQ is actively managed, while CARD is passively managed. Over the past year, TSLQ returned -49.38% vs -30.65% for CARD. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLQ charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CARD.
Performance
TSLQ vs. CARD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLQ achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly higher than CARD's 5.96% return.
TSLQ
- 1D
- 11.57%
- 1M
- 18.36%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 31.99%
- 1Y
- -49.38%
- 3Y*
- -64.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CARD
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- -30.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLQ vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 13.60% | -74.67% | -83.21% | -6.25% |
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 5.96% | -60.21% | -58.19% | -32.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLQ and CARD is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023 | 0.62 |
The correlation between TSLQ and CARD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLQ vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank
TSLQ
CARD
TSLQ vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLQ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.97 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | -0.66 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | -0.97 | +0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLQ vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLQ drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, which is greater than CARD's maximum drawdown of -93.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLQ and CARD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLQ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.73% | -93.51% | -5.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.21% | -46.42% | -25.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.31% | -92.04% | -6.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.61% | -68.71% | +1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.23% | 31.50% | +24.73% |
Volatility
TSLQ vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a higher volatility of 27.76% compared to Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) at 24.36%. This indicates that TSLQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CARD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLQ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.76% | 24.36% | +3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.68% | 52.63% | +4.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.33% | 70.25% | +19.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.31% | 80.74% | +13.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.31% | 80.74% | +13.57% |
TSLQ vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLQ has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLQ vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison
TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%, while CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 9.30% | 10.56% | 4.95% | 13.35% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLQ and CARD have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLQ has higher volatility (27.76%) compared to CARD (24.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLQ dropped -98.73% vs CARD's -93.51%.
On 1-year performance, CARD leads with -30.65% vs -49.38% for TSLQ. On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CARD has been the lower-risk option at 24.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CARD has performed better with a -30.65% return vs -49.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for TSLQ.
TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.30%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Max. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for TSLQ and 0.95% for CARD.
CARD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLQ and CARD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer