TSLQ vs. CARD
TSLQ (AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF) and CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds. TSLQ is actively managed, while CARD is passively managed. Over the past year, TSLQ returned -62.78% vs -39.29% for CARD. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLQ charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CARD.
Performance
TSLQ vs. CARD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TSLQ having a -3.80% return and CARD slightly higher at -3.66%.
TSLQ
- 1D
- -3.75%
- 1M
- -18.02%
- YTD
- -3.80%
- 6M
- -15.12%
- 1Y
- -62.78%
- 3Y*
- -68.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CARD
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -9.70%
- YTD
- -3.66%
- 6M
- -8.10%
- 1Y
- -39.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLQ vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLQ AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF | -3.80% | -74.67% | -83.21% | -3.89% |
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -3.66% | -60.21% | -58.19% | -30.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLQ and CARD is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023 | 0.62 |
The correlation between TSLQ and CARD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLQ vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank
TSLQ
CARD
TSLQ vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLQ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | -0.57 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | -0.54 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.94 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | -0.75 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | -1.10 | +0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLQ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | -0.57 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.65 | -0.66 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
TSLQ vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLQ drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, which is greater than CARD's maximum drawdown of -93.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLQ and CARD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLQ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.73% | -93.51% | -5.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.93% | -49.57% | -26.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.57% | -92.76% | -5.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.15% | -68.10% | +0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 59.46% | 33.82% | +25.64% |
Volatility
TSLQ vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison
AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) have volatilities of 24.08% and 23.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLQ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.08% | 23.60% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.84% | 50.31% | +4.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.72% | 68.78% | +23.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.16% | 80.58% | +13.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.16% | 80.58% | +13.58% |
TSLQ vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLQ has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLQ vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison
TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.98%, while CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLQ AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF | 10.98% | 10.56% | 4.95% | 13.35% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLQ and CARD have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLQ has higher volatility (24.08%) compared to CARD (23.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLQ dropped -98.73% vs CARD's -93.51%.
On 1-year performance, CARD leads with -39.29% vs -62.78% for TSLQ. On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CARD has been the lower-risk option at 23.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CARD has performed better with a -39.29% return vs -62.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSLQ.
TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.98%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.
They also come from different issuers: AXS and Max. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSLQ and 0.95% for CARD.
CARD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLQ and CARD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer