TSLQ vs. CARD
TSLQ (Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF) and CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds. TSLQ is actively managed, while CARD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TSLQ returned -61.50%/yr vs -49.61%/yr for CARD. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TSLQ charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CARD.
Performance
TSLQ vs. CARD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLQ achieves a 38.93% return, which is significantly higher than CARD's -11.90% return.
TSLQ
- 1D
- -6.90%
- 1M
- 35.06%
- 6M
- 26.09%
- YTD
- 38.93%
- 1Y
- -49.80%
- 3Y*
- -61.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -55.33%
CARD
- 1D
- -3.27%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- 6M
- -9.54%
- YTD
- -11.90%
- 1Y
- -40.90%
- 3Y*
- -49.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -52.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.40K | $47.06K | $45.44K | |
| $162.37M | $140.91M | $160.99M |
TSLQ vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 38.93% | -74.67% | -83.21% | -6.25% |
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -11.90% | -60.21% | -58.19% | -32.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLQ and CARD is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023 | 0.61 |
The correlation between TSLQ and CARD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLQ vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank
TSLQ
CARD
TSLQ vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLQ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 0.94 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | -0.94 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.92 | -1.47 | +0.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLQ vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLQ drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, which is greater than CARD's maximum drawdown of -93.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLQ and CARD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLQ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.73% | -93.74% | -4.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.10% | -43.65% | -24.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.85% | -93.74% | -4.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.93% | -93.38% | -4.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.45% | -69.59% | +1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 55.92% | 29.28% | +26.64% |
Volatility
TSLQ vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a higher volatility of 36.02% compared to Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) at 23.55%. This indicates that TSLQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CARD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLQ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 36.02% | 23.55% | +12.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.36% | 54.51% | +12.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.80% | 72.06% | +20.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.65% | 80.48% | +15.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.65% | 80.48% | +15.17% |
TSLQ vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLQ has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLQ vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison
TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, while CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 7.60% | 10.56% | 4.95% | 13.35% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLQ and CARD have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLQ has higher volatility (36.02%) compared to CARD (23.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLQ dropped -98.73% vs CARD's -93.74%.
On 3-year performance, CARD leads with -49.61% vs -61.50% for TSLQ. On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CARD has been the lower-risk option at 23.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, CARD has performed better with a -49.61% return vs -61.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for TSLQ.
TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 7.60%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Max. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for TSLQ and 0.95% for CARD.
TSLQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.54 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLQ and CARD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer