TSLP vs. MSFY
TSLP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF) and MSFY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Kurv. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLP returned 15.63% vs -7.25% for MSFY. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLP charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for MSFY.
Performance
TSLP vs. MSFY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLP achieves a -8.72% return, which is significantly higher than MSFY's -13.99% return.
TSLP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- -8.72%
- 6M
- -8.30%
- 1Y
- 15.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFY
- 1D
- -3.43%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- -13.99%
- 6M
- -12.67%
- 1Y
- -7.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLP vs. MSFY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF | -8.72% | 9.77% | 41.53% | 12.70% |
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF | -13.99% | 14.11% | 10.88% | 2.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLP and MSFY is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023 | 0.32 |
The correlation between TSLP and MSFY shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLP vs. MSFY — Risk / Return Rank
TSLP
MSFY
TSLP vs. MSFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLP | MSFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.97 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | -0.21 | +0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.20 | -0.47 | +1.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLP | MSFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | -0.27 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.20 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
TSLP vs. MSFY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLP drawdown since its inception was -46.00%, which is greater than MSFY's maximum drawdown of -34.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLP and MSFY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLP | MSFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.00% | -34.21% | -11.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.00% | -34.21% | +2.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.68% | -20.53% | +4.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.73% | -7.20% | -8.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.16% | 15.40% | -2.24% |
Volatility
TSLP vs. MSFY - Volatility Comparison
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) has a higher volatility of 12.75% compared to Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) at 10.84%. This indicates that TSLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLP | MSFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.75% | 10.84% | +1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.48% | 25.02% | +3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.87% | 26.51% | +16.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.60% | 22.27% | +26.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.60% | 22.27% | +26.33% |
TSLP vs. MSFY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFY's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLP vs. MSFY - Dividend Comparison
TSLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.32%, more than MSFY's 24.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF | 24.31% | 18.56% | 14.35% | 1.94% |
TSLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF | 30.32% | 31.05% | 21.82% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLP and MSFY have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLP has higher volatility (12.75%) compared to MSFY (10.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLP dropped -46.00% vs MSFY's -34.21%.
On 1-year performance, TSLP leads with 15.63% vs -7.25% for MSFY. On fees, TSLP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, MSFY has been the lower-risk option at 10.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLP has performed better with a 15.63% return vs -7.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for MSFY.
TSLP has the higher dividend yield at 30.32%, compared with 24.31% for MSFY.
Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSLP and 1.00% for MSFY.
TSLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLP and MSFY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer