PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLP vs. MSFY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLP vs. MSFY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLP achieves a -8.72% return, which is significantly higher than MSFY's -13.99% return.


TSLP

1D
0.04%
1M
7.73%
YTD
-8.72%
6M
-8.30%
1Y
15.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSFY

1D
-3.43%
1M
4.37%
YTD
-13.99%
6M
-12.67%
1Y
-7.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLP vs. MSFY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TSLP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF
-8.72%9.77%41.53%12.70%
MSFY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF
-13.99%14.11%10.88%2.57%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLP and MSFY is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023

0.32

The correlation between TSLP and MSFY shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLP vs. MSFY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLP
TSLP Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
TSLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

MSFY
MSFY Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
MSFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFY Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLP vs. MSFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLPMSFYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.97

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

-0.21

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.20

-0.47

+1.67

TSLP vs. MSFY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the MSFY Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLP and MSFY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLPMSFYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

-0.27

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.20

+0.26

Drawdowns

TSLP vs. MSFY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLP drawdown since its inception was -46.00%, which is greater than MSFY's maximum drawdown of -34.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLP and MSFY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLPMSFYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.00%

-34.21%

-11.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.00%

-34.21%

+2.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.68%

-20.53%

+4.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.73%

-7.20%

-8.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.16%

15.40%

-2.24%

Volatility

TSLP vs. MSFY - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) has a higher volatility of 12.75% compared to Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) at 10.84%. This indicates that TSLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLPMSFYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.75%

10.84%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.48%

25.02%

+3.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.87%

26.51%

+16.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.60%

22.27%

+26.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.60%

22.27%

+26.33%

TSLP vs. MSFY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFY's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLP vs. MSFY - Dividend Comparison

TSLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.32%, more than MSFY's 24.31% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MSFY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF
24.31%18.56%14.35%1.94%
TSLP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF
30.32%31.05%21.82%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLP and MSFY have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLP has higher volatility (12.75%) compared to MSFY (10.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLP dropped -46.00% vs MSFY's -34.21%.

On 1-year performance, TSLP leads with 15.63% vs -7.25% for MSFY. On fees, TSLP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, MSFY has been the lower-risk option at 10.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLP has performed better with a 15.63% return vs -7.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for MSFY.

TSLP has the higher dividend yield at 30.32%, compared with 24.31% for MSFY.

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSLP and 1.00% for MSFY.

TSLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLP and MSFY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer