TSLO vs. PQAP
TSLO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA Monthly ETF) and PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSLO charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PQAP.
Performance
TSLO vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLO achieves a -5.63% return, which is significantly lower than PQAP's 12.09% return.
TSLO
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- -5.63%
- 6M
- -0.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PQAP
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 21.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLO vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSLO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA Monthly ETF | -5.63% | 20.81% |
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April | 12.09% | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLO and PQAP is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLO vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank
TSLO
PQAP
TSLO vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA Monthly ETF (TSLO) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLO | PQAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.76 | -1.30 |
Drawdowns
TSLO vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLO drawdown since its inception was -25.40%, which is greater than PQAP's maximum drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLO and PQAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLO | PQAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.40% | -10.79% | -14.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.53% | -0.12% | -8.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.88% | -0.60% | -7.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility
TSLO vs. PQAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLO | PQAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.08% | 4.45% | +33.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.08% | 11.03% | +27.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.08% | 11.03% | +27.05% |
TSLO vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLO has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than PQAP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLO vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison
TSLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.92%, more than PQAP's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April | 0.02% | 0.02% |
TSLO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA Monthly ETF | 20.92% | 19.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLO and PQAP have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PQAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PQAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for TSLO.
TSLO has the higher dividend yield at 20.92%, compared with 0.02% for PQAP.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for TSLO and 0.50% for PQAP.
Find the right allocation for TSLO and PQAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer