TSLO vs. KMAR
TSLO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA Monthly ETF) and KMAR (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March) are both Defined Outcome funds. TSLO is actively managed, while KMAR is passively managed. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TSLO charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for KMAR.
Performance
TSLO vs. KMAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLO achieves a -9.40% return, which is significantly lower than KMAR's 11.80% return.
TSLO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- -9.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
KMAR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- YTD
- 11.80%
- 1Y
- 23.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $120.20K | $79.11K | $171.79K | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $7.71K |
TSLO vs. KMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSLO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA Monthly ETF | -9.40% | 18.49% |
KMAR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March | 11.80% | 7.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLO and KMAR is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLO vs. KMAR — Risk / Return Rank
TSLO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KMAR
TSLO vs. KMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA Monthly ETF (TSLO) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March (KMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLO | KMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.57 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 19.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLO vs. KMAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLO drawdown since its inception was -25.40%, which is greater than KMAR's maximum drawdown of -11.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLO and KMAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLO | KMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.40% | -11.32% | -14.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.19% | -0.54% | -11.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.64% | -1.26% | -7.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.16% | — |
Volatility
TSLO vs. KMAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLO | KMAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.36% | 9.19% | +27.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.36% | 11.78% | +24.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.36% | 11.78% | +24.58% |
TSLO vs. KMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLO has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than KMAR's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLO vs. KMAR - Dividend Comparison
TSLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.79%, while KMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
KMAR Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated TSLA Monthly ETF | 21.79% | 19.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLO and KMAR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KMAR.
TSLO has the higher dividend yield at 21.79%, compared with 0.00% for KMAR.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for TSLO and 0.79% for KMAR.
Find the right allocation for TSLO and KMAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer