PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLL vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLL vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLL achieves a -36.12% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 9.49% return.


TSLL

1D
-1.64%
1M
-9.93%
6M
-32.10%
YTD
-36.12%
1Y
7.23%
3Y*
-11.73%
5Y*
10Y*

WNTR

1D
2.96%
1M
17.94%
6M
21.62%
YTD
9.49%
1Y
127.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLL vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TSLL and WNTR is -0.39, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLL vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLL
TSLL Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
TSLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLL Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLL Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLL vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLLWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.35

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

3.02

-2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.25

7.72

-7.47

TSLL vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLL Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLL and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLL vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLL drawdown since its inception was -82.88%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLL and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLLWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.88%

-42.65%

-40.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.75%

-42.65%

-12.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.74%

-10.67%

-57.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.11%

-20.46%

-33.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.95%

16.63%

+12.32%

Volatility

TSLL vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) has a higher volatility of 33.55% compared to YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) at 17.89%. This indicates that TSLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLLWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.55%

17.89%

+15.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.28%

47.05%

+15.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

89.11%

53.81%

+35.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.11%

53.49%

+53.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

107.11%

53.49%

+53.62%

TSLL vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLL has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLL vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

TSLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.20%, less than WNTR's 106.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
TSLL
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF
8.20%5.00%2.47%4.44%1.57%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
106.86%58.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLL and WNTR have a correlation of -0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLL has higher volatility (33.55%) compared to WNTR (17.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLL dropped -82.88% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 127.90% vs 7.23% for TSLL. On fees, TSLL is cheaper at 0.83% per year. On volatility, WNTR has been the lower-risk option at 17.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 127.90% return vs 7.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLL is cheaper with a 0.83% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 106.86%, compared with 8.20% for TSLL.

TSLL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for TSLL and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLL and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer