PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLL vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLL vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLL achieves a -20.85% return, which is significantly lower than IBIC's 2.37% return.


TSLL

1D
0.00%
1M
13.88%
YTD
-20.85%
6M
-21.38%
1Y
7.17%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
2.37%
6M
2.51%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLL vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TSLL
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF
-20.85%-26.80%99.63%-17.23%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.37%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLL and IBIC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023

-0.03

The correlation between TSLL and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLL vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLL
TSLL Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TSLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLL Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLL vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLLIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

2.24

-1.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

17.27

-17.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.27

67.45

-67.18

TSLL vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLL Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLL and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLLIBICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

5.05

-4.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

3.49

-3.57

Drawdowns

TSLL vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLL drawdown since its inception was -82.88%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLL and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLLIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.88%

-0.90%

-81.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.75%

-0.26%

-54.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.03%

-0.13%

-59.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.82%

-0.10%

-53.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.72%

0.07%

+26.65%

Volatility

TSLL vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) has a higher volatility of 24.26% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.33%. This indicates that TSLL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLLIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.26%

0.33%

+23.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.47%

0.67%

+53.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.38%

0.90%

+91.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

106.87%

1.58%

+105.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

106.87%

1.58%

+105.29%

TSLL vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLL has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSLL vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

TSLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%0.00%
TSLL
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF
6.46%5.00%2.47%4.44%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLL and IBIC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLL has higher volatility (24.26%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLL dropped -82.88% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, TSLL leads with 7.17% vs 4.54% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLL has performed better with a 7.17% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for TSLL.

TSLL has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.

TSLL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for TSLL and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLL and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer