TSLL vs. COIG
TSLL (Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF) and COIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLL returned 7.17% vs -79.30% for COIG. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLL charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COIG.
Performance
TSLL vs. COIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLL achieves a -20.85% return, which is significantly higher than COIG's -61.85% return.
TSLL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 13.88%
- YTD
- -20.85%
- 6M
- -21.38%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COIG
- 1D
- -11.21%
- 1M
- -37.91%
- YTD
- -61.85%
- 6M
- -75.19%
- 1Y
- -79.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLL vs. COIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | -20.85% | 118.56% |
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF | -61.85% | -9.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLL and COIG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLL vs. COIG — Risk / Return Rank
TSLL
COIG
TSLL vs. COIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLL | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.93 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | -0.86 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | -1.20 | +1.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLL | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 | -0.57 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.08 | -0.40 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
TSLL vs. COIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLL drawdown since its inception was -82.88%, smaller than the maximum COIG drawdown of -92.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLL and COIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLL | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.88% | -92.06% | +9.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.75% | -92.06% | +37.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.03% | -91.42% | +31.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.82% | -51.70% | -2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.72% | 65.88% | -39.16% |
Volatility
TSLL vs. COIG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) is 24.26%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) has a volatility of 37.85%. This indicates that TSLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLL | COIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.26% | 37.85% | -13.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.47% | 100.21% | -45.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.38% | 139.35% | -46.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 106.87% | 146.45% | -39.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 106.87% | 146.45% | -39.58% |
TSLL vs. COIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLL has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than COIG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLL vs. COIG - Dividend Comparison
TSLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, while COIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | 6.46% | 5.00% | 2.47% | 4.44% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLL and COIG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COIG has higher volatility (37.85%) compared to TSLL (24.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLL dropped -82.88% vs COIG's -92.06%.
On 1-year performance, TSLL leads with 7.17% vs -79.30% for COIG. On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TSLL has been the lower-risk option at 24.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLL has performed better with a 7.17% return vs -79.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for TSLL.
TSLL has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 0.00% for COIG.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for TSLL and 0.75% for COIG.
TSLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLL and COIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer