PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLI.L vs. TRIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLI.L vs. TRIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLI.L achieves a -24.15% return, which is significantly lower than TRIN's 37.03% return.


TSLI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-9.66%
YTD
-24.15%
6M
-26.27%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TRIN

1D
4.05%
1M
12.80%
YTD
37.03%
6M
37.44%
1Y
55.25%
3Y*
29.05%
5Y*
21.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLI.L vs. TRIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSLI.L
IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP
-24.15%15.61%25.40%
TRIN
Trinity Capital Inc.
37.03%16.01%7.80%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLI.L and TRIN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2024

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLI.L vs. TRIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLI.L
TSLI.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

TRIN
TRIN Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TRIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIN Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLI.L vs. TRIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TSLI.LTRINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.44

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

3.70

-3.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.21

9.32

-9.12

TSLI.L vs. TRIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLI.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the TRIN Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLI.L and TRIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TSLI.L vs. TRIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLI.L drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, roughly equal to the maximum TRIN drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLI.L and TRIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLI.LTRINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.20%

-43.12%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.69%

-14.99%

-18.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.89%

0.00%

-28.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.69%

-8.84%

-5.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.01%

5.94%

+10.07%

Volatility

TSLI.L vs. TRIN - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP (TSLI.L) has a higher volatility of 10.79% compared to Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) at 8.33%. This indicates that TSLI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLI.LTRINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.79%

8.33%

+2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.09%

16.90%

+10.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.06%

21.27%

+16.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.05%

26.81%

+17.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.05%

27.03%

+17.02%

Dividends

TSLI.L vs. TRIN - Dividend Comparison

TSLI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 35.17%, more than TRIN's 19.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
TRIN
Trinity Capital Inc.
19.93%13.92%14.10%14.04%21.32%7.17%
TSLI.L
IncomeShares Tesla TSLA Options ETP
35.17%55.94%5.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSLI.L and TRIN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLI.L and TRIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer