PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSLG vs. NVDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSLG vs. NVDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLG achieves a -20.71% return, which is significantly lower than NVDG's 28.37% return.


TSLG

1D
3.94%
1M
14.75%
YTD
-20.71%
6M
-14.74%
1Y
8.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDG

1D
-1.37%
1M
23.25%
YTD
28.37%
6M
33.64%
1Y
108.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLG vs. NVDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
-20.71%-26.70%-16.81%
NVDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF
28.37%32.45%-0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLG and NVDG is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSLG vs. NVDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDG
NVDG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
NVDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDG Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLG vs. NVDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSLGNVDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.09

1.62

-1.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.79

2.18

-1.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.26

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

2.71

-2.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.24

6.19

-5.94

TSLG vs. NVDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the NVDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLG and NVDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSLGNVDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

1.62

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.34

0.48

-0.82

Drawdowns

TSLG vs. NVDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLG drawdown since its inception was -82.86%, which is greater than NVDG's maximum drawdown of -66.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLG and NVDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSLGNVDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.86%

-66.19%

-16.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.61%

-42.72%

-11.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.94%

-11.86%

-48.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.72%

-23.08%

-35.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.54%

18.73%

+7.81%

Volatility

TSLG vs. NVDG - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) have volatilities of 24.39% and 23.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSLGNVDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.39%

23.61%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.58%

49.62%

+4.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.55%

67.45%

+25.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

115.47%

90.62%

+24.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

115.47%

90.62%

+24.85%

TSLG vs. NVDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TSLG and NVDG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

TSLG vs. NVDG - Dividend Comparison

TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, less than NVDG's 9.20% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TSLG and NVDG have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLG has higher volatility (24.39%) compared to NVDG (23.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLG dropped -82.86% vs NVDG's -66.19%.

On 1-year performance, NVDG leads with 108.24% vs 8.61% for TSLG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, NVDG has been the lower-risk option at 23.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDG has performed better with a 108.24% return vs 8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLG and NVDG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

NVDG has the higher dividend yield at 9.20%, compared with 8.26% for TSLG.

NVDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSLG and NVDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer