TSLG vs. MVLL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TSLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TSLG is actively managed, while MVLL is passively managed. Over the past year, TSLG returned 8.61% vs 1163.51% for MVLL. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MVLL.

Performance

TSLG vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLG achieves a -20.71% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 779.83% return.

TSLG

• 1D: 3.94%
• 1M: 14.75%
• YTD: -20.71%
• 6M: -14.74%
• 1Y: 8.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MVLL

• 1D: 65.00%
• 1M: 176.74%
• YTD: 779.83%
• 6M: 610.16%
• 1Y: 1,163.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLG vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF	-20.71%	88.99%
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF	779.83%	-10.19%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLG and MVLL is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2025	0.39

Return for Risk

TSLG vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLG

TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 12
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 16
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 10

MVLL

MVLL Risk / Return Rank: 96
MVLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MVLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
MVLL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
MVLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MVLL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLG vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSLG	MVLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.09	8.85	-8.75
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.79	4.74	-3.94
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.62	-0.53
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.12	24.93	-24.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.24	51.99	-51.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSLG vs. MVLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the MVLL Sharpe Ratio of 8.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLG and MVLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSLG	MVLL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.09	8.85	-8.75
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.34	3.13	-3.47

Drawdowns

TSLG vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLG drawdown since its inception was -82.86%, which is greater than MVLL's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLG and MVLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLG	MVLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.86%	-59.02%	-23.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-54.61%	-48.93%	-5.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.94%	0.00%	-59.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.72%	-22.49%	-36.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.54%	23.46%	+3.08%

Volatility

TSLG vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) is 24.39%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) has a volatility of 61.15%. This indicates that TSLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLG	MVLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.39%	61.15%	-36.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.58%	95.96%	-41.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.55%	133.02%	-40.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	115.47%	139.75%	-24.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	115.47%	139.75%	-24.28%

TSLG vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLG vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison

TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, while MVLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF	8.26%	6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLG and MVLL in my portfolio?

TSLG and MVLL have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLG or MVLL?

MVLL has higher volatility (61.15%) compared to TSLG (24.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLG dropped -82.86% vs MVLL's -59.02%.

Which ETF is better, TSLG or MVLL?

On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 1163.51% vs 8.61% for TSLG. On fees, TSLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TSLG has been the lower-risk option at 24.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLG or MVLL?

Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 1163.51% return vs 8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLG or MVLL?

TSLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLG or MVLL?

TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 8.26%, compared with 0.00% for MVLL.

What is the main difference between TSLG and MVLL?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TSLG and 1.50% for MVLL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.85 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.