TSLG vs. EINC
TSLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. TSLG is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. Over the past year, TSLG returned -12.69% vs 29.82% for EINC. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.
Performance
TSLG vs. EINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLG achieves a -37.23% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 25.97% return.
TSLG
- 1D
- -11.63%
- 1M
- -22.10%
- YTD
- -37.23%
- 6M
- -46.41%
- 1Y
- -12.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EINC
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- YTD
- 25.97%
- 6M
- 25.98%
- 1Y
- 29.82%
- 3Y*
- 30.36%
- 5Y*
- 21.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
TSLG vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | -37.23% | -26.70% | -14.82% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 25.97% | 7.11% | -1.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLG and EINC is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024 | 0.12 |
The correlation between TSLG and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLG vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank
TSLG
EINC
TSLG vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLG | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.35 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 3.80 | -4.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 9.63 | -10.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLG vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLG drawdown since its inception was -82.86%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLG and EINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLG | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.86% | -87.55% | +4.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.61% | -7.89% | -46.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.29% | -4.50% | -63.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.78% | -44.15% | -14.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.68% | 3.10% | +24.58% |
Volatility
TSLG vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) has a higher volatility of 29.15% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 6.51%. This indicates that TSLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLG | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 29.15% | 6.51% | +22.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.01% | 11.88% | +45.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.25% | 15.10% | +74.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 115.05% | 19.54% | +95.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.05% | 25.43% | +89.62% |
TSLG vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSLG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSLG vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison
TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.43%, more than EINC's 3.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.51% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | 10.43% | 6.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLG and EINC have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLG has higher volatility (29.15%) compared to EINC (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLG dropped -82.86% vs EINC's -87.55%.
On 1-year performance, EINC leads with 29.82% vs -12.69% for TSLG. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EINC has performed better with a 29.82% return vs -12.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for TSLG.
TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 10.43%, compared with 3.51% for EINC.
TSLG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for TSLG and 0.45% for EINC.
EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLG and EINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer